Abstract
Despite the near concurrent publication by influential scientific organizations, there are important differences in interpretation of the evidence base and the conclusions derived from the recent Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) guidelines for the management of knee osteoarthritis, the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) guidelines (concerning also hip and hand osteoarthritis) and the algorithm recommendations by the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis (ESCEO). This is particularly evident for the drug class of symptomatic slow-acting drugs in osteoarthritis. In this paper, we highlight these differences and try to understand where they derive from, proposing an evidence-based interpretation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1041-1045 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Current Medical Research and Opinion |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 May 2015 |
Keywords
- Chondroitin
- Glucosamine
- Hyaluronic acid
- Osteoarthritis
- Symptomatic slow-acting drugs in osteoarthritis
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comments on the discordant recommendations for the use of symptomatic slow-acting drugs in knee osteoarthritis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver