Comentário a: «Resultados clínicos e de custo-eficácia da intervenção coronária percutânea guiada por reserva de fluxo coronário em doentes com doença coronária estável: seguimento a três anos do estudo FAME-2 (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation)»

Translated title of the contribution: Comment on: << Clinical Outcomes and Cost Effectiveness of Fractional Flow Reserve Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease: Three-Year Follow-Up of the FAME 2 Trial ( Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation)>>

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

Translated title of the contributionComment on: << Clinical Outcomes and Cost Effectiveness of Fractional Flow Reserve Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease: Three-Year Follow-Up of the FAME 2 Trial ( Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation)>>
Original languagePortuguese
Pages (from-to)967-969
Number of pages3
JournalRevista Portuguesa de Cardiologia
Volume36
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2017

Cite this