Collective Argumentative Criticism in Informal Online Discussion Forums

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper, I preliminarily characterize and evaluate two variants of a pattern of collective argumentative criticism in online political discussion forums available through Google Groups. In the first variant-horizontal criticism-a group of arguers jointly objects to distinct elements of complex argumentation put forward by their opponent. In the second variant-vertical criticism-a group of arguers acts in sequence by deepening the previously voiced criticisms against one element of their opponent's argumentation. Such collective criticism of arguments is to a certain extent the reverse of a pattern of joint production of arguments, or a “tag-team argument, “identified by analysts of argument in small face-to-face groups. I argue that collective criticism can enhance public scrutiny of opinions expressed in informal deliberation, yet it can also lead to inconclusive argumentative discussions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)86-105
Number of pages20
JournalArgumentation And Advocacy
Volume47
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Keywords

  • critical reactions
  • group argumentation
  • online deliberation
  • online discussion forums
  • pragma-dialectics
  • tag-team argument

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Collective Argumentative Criticism in Informal Online Discussion Forums'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this