Classics in megaproject management: a structured analysis of three major works

Julien Pollack, Christopher Biesenthal, Shankar Sankaran, Stewart Clegg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The paper explores three texts in the field of megaproject management that intersubjectively, in terms of community sentiment, might be considered ‘classics’. We deploy four criteria for a structured analysis that determines if the status of the works in question may be considered classic. The works examined are Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition by Flyvbjerg, Bruzelius and Rothengatter; (2003) The Anatomy of Major Projects by Morris and Hough (1987) and Industrial Megaprojects by Merrow (2011). Based on these works we conclude with a prospectus for future research that will serve to develop the field of research into megaproject management.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)372-384
Number of pages13
JournalInternational Journal of Project Management
Volume36
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2018

Keywords

  • Analysis
  • Classics
  • Megaprojects
  • Review

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Classics in megaproject management: a structured analysis of three major works'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this