Charles S. Peirce`s Natural Foundation for Religious Faith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to analyze Charles S. Peirce's so-called "Neglected Argument for the Reality of God". Peirce formulated the Neglected Argument as a "nest" of three different but sequentially developed arguments. Taken as a whole, the Neglected Argument aims to show that engaging in a religious way of life, adoring and acting in accordance with the hypothesis of God, is a subjective, non-evidentially grounded though naturally founded human reaction, and that it is this (alleged) natural foundation that makes it reasonable to accept the hypothesis of God as it being actually true, thereby grounding a properly religious way of life. I argue that Peirce's Neglected Argument lacks any serious apologetic force since it fails to justify, on independent, non-question-begging grounds, the claim that we are all naturally (and thus inevitably) lead to formulate, and later adore and act in accordance with, the hypothesis of God.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)87-99
Number of pages13
JournalTeorema
Volume40
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Keywords

  • Charles S. Peirce
  • Natural Foundation
  • Neglected Argument for the Reality of God
  • Religious Faith

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Charles S. Peirce`s Natural Foundation for Religious Faith'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this