TY - JOUR
T1 - Biomonitoring as an underused exposure assessment tool in occupational safety and health context
T2 - challenges and way forward
AU - Viegas, Susana
AU - Jeddi, Maryam Zare
AU - Hopf, Nancy B.
AU - Bessems, Jos
AU - Palmen, Nicole
AU - Galea, Karen S.
AU - Jones, Kate
AU - Kujath, Peter
AU - Duca, Radu Corneliu
AU - Verhagen, Hans
AU - Santonen, Tiina
AU - Pasanen-Kase, Robert
PY - 2020/8/2
Y1 - 2020/8/2
N2 - Recent advances in analytical chemistry have allowed a greater possibility of using quantitative approaches for measuring human exposure to chemicals. One of these approaches is biomonitoring (BM), which provides unequivocal evidence that both exposure and uptake of a chemical have taken place. BM has been a longstanding practice in occupational health for several reasons. BM integrates exposure from all routes. It can help identify unintentional and unexpected exposures and assess the effectiveness of existing risk-management measures. BM also provides relevant information to support policy development by delivering better evidence of workers’ exposure to chemical substances, even within the framework of the present regulations. Thus, BM can allow for both the evaluation of the impact of regulation and identification of further needs for new or improved regulation. However, despite all these well-recognized advantages, BM is currently an underused exposure assessment tool. This paper provides an overview of the key aspects to be considered when using BM in the context of occupational health interventions. Additionally, this paper describes the potential of BM as an exposure assessment tool, distinguishing the role of BM in exposure assessment and health surveillance and clarifies ethical and communication aspects to guarantee that general data protection regulations are followed. In addition, actions and research needs are identified (particularly with reference to the European situation), which aim to encourage the increased use of BM as an exposure assessment tool.
AB - Recent advances in analytical chemistry have allowed a greater possibility of using quantitative approaches for measuring human exposure to chemicals. One of these approaches is biomonitoring (BM), which provides unequivocal evidence that both exposure and uptake of a chemical have taken place. BM has been a longstanding practice in occupational health for several reasons. BM integrates exposure from all routes. It can help identify unintentional and unexpected exposures and assess the effectiveness of existing risk-management measures. BM also provides relevant information to support policy development by delivering better evidence of workers’ exposure to chemical substances, even within the framework of the present regulations. Thus, BM can allow for both the evaluation of the impact of regulation and identification of further needs for new or improved regulation. However, despite all these well-recognized advantages, BM is currently an underused exposure assessment tool. This paper provides an overview of the key aspects to be considered when using BM in the context of occupational health interventions. Additionally, this paper describes the potential of BM as an exposure assessment tool, distinguishing the role of BM in exposure assessment and health surveillance and clarifies ethical and communication aspects to guarantee that general data protection regulations are followed. In addition, actions and research needs are identified (particularly with reference to the European situation), which aim to encourage the increased use of BM as an exposure assessment tool.
KW - Biological guidance value
KW - Biological limit value
KW - Biological monitoring
KW - Exposure assessment
KW - Occupational health
KW - Risk assessment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089558244&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/ijerph17165884
DO - 10.3390/ijerph17165884
M3 - Article
C2 - 32823696
AN - SCOPUS:85089558244
SN - 1661-7827
VL - 17
SP - 1
EP - 20
JO - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
JF - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
IS - 16
M1 - 5884
ER -