TY - JOUR
T1 - BestFLR trial
T2 - Liver regeneration at CT before major hepatectomies for liver cancer—A randomized controlled trial comparing portal vein embolization with N-butyl-cyanoacrylate plus iodized oil versus polyvinyl alcohol particles plus coils
AU - Mendes Luz, José Hugo
AU - Gomes, Filipe Veloso
AU - Costa, Nuno Vasco
AU - Vasco, Inês
AU - Coimbra, Elia
AU - Luz, Paula Mendes
AU - Marques, Hugo Pinto
AU - Coelho, João Santos
AU - Alexandre Mega, Raquel Maria
AU - Vouga Ribeiro, Vasco Nuno Torres
AU - Costa Lamelas, Jorge Tiago Rodriguesda
AU - Nunese Sobral, Maria Mafaldade Sampaio
AU - Gomesda Silva, Sílvia Raquel
AU - Teixeira Carrelha, Ana Sofiade
AU - Rodrigues, Susana Cristina Cardoso
AU - Figueiredo, António Augusto Ferreira Pintode
AU - Santos, Margarida Varela
AU - Bilhim, Tiago
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Radiological Society of North America Inc.. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/6
Y1 - 2021/6
N2 - Background: In patients with liver cancer, portal vein embolization (PVE) is recommended to promote liver growth before major hepatectomies. However, the optimal embolization strategy has not been established. Purpose: To compare liver regeneration as seen at CT in participants with liver cancer, before major hepatectomies, with N-butylcyanoacrylate (NBCA) plus iodized oil versus standard polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) particles plus coils, for PVE. Materials and Methods: In this single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial (Best Future Liver Remnant, or BestFLR, trial; International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number 16062796), PVE with NBCA plus iodized oil was compared with standard PVE with PVA particles plus coils in participants with liver cancer. Participant recruitment started in November 2017 and ended in March 2020. Participants were randomly assigned to undergo PVE with PVA particles plus coils or PVE with NBCA plus iodized oil. The primary end point was liver growth assessed with CT 14 days and 28 days after PVE. Secondary outcomes included posthepatectomy liver failure, surgical complications, and length of intensive care treatment and hospital stay. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare continuous outcomes according to PVE material, whereas the x2 test or Fisher exact test was used for categoric variables. Results: Sixty participants (mean age, 61 years 6 11 [standard deviation]; 32 men) were assigned to the PVA particles plus coils group (n = 30) or to the NBCA plus iodized oil group (n = 30). Interim analysis revealed faster and superior liver hypertrophy for the NBCA plus iodized oil group versus the PVA particles plus coils group 14 days and 28 days after PVE (absolute hypertrophy of 46% vs 30% [P , .001] and 57% vs 37% [P , .001], respectively). Liver growth for the proposed hepatectomy was achieved in 87% of participants (26 of 30) in the NBCA plus iodized oil group versus 53% of participants (16 of 30) in the PVA particles plus coils group (P = .008) 14 days after PVE. Liver failure occurred in 13% of participants (three of 24) in the NBCA plus iodized oil group and in 27% of participants (six of 22) in the PVA particles plus coils group (P = .27). Conclusion: Portal vein embolization with N-butyl-cyanoacrylate plus iodized oil produced greater and faster liver growth as seen at CT in participants with liver cancer, compared with portal vein embolization with polyvinyl alcohol particles plus coils, allowing for earlier surgical intervention.
AB - Background: In patients with liver cancer, portal vein embolization (PVE) is recommended to promote liver growth before major hepatectomies. However, the optimal embolization strategy has not been established. Purpose: To compare liver regeneration as seen at CT in participants with liver cancer, before major hepatectomies, with N-butylcyanoacrylate (NBCA) plus iodized oil versus standard polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) particles plus coils, for PVE. Materials and Methods: In this single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial (Best Future Liver Remnant, or BestFLR, trial; International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number 16062796), PVE with NBCA plus iodized oil was compared with standard PVE with PVA particles plus coils in participants with liver cancer. Participant recruitment started in November 2017 and ended in March 2020. Participants were randomly assigned to undergo PVE with PVA particles plus coils or PVE with NBCA plus iodized oil. The primary end point was liver growth assessed with CT 14 days and 28 days after PVE. Secondary outcomes included posthepatectomy liver failure, surgical complications, and length of intensive care treatment and hospital stay. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare continuous outcomes according to PVE material, whereas the x2 test or Fisher exact test was used for categoric variables. Results: Sixty participants (mean age, 61 years 6 11 [standard deviation]; 32 men) were assigned to the PVA particles plus coils group (n = 30) or to the NBCA plus iodized oil group (n = 30). Interim analysis revealed faster and superior liver hypertrophy for the NBCA plus iodized oil group versus the PVA particles plus coils group 14 days and 28 days after PVE (absolute hypertrophy of 46% vs 30% [P , .001] and 57% vs 37% [P , .001], respectively). Liver growth for the proposed hepatectomy was achieved in 87% of participants (26 of 30) in the NBCA plus iodized oil group versus 53% of participants (16 of 30) in the PVA particles plus coils group (P = .008) 14 days after PVE. Liver failure occurred in 13% of participants (three of 24) in the NBCA plus iodized oil group and in 27% of participants (six of 22) in the PVA particles plus coils group (P = .27). Conclusion: Portal vein embolization with N-butyl-cyanoacrylate plus iodized oil produced greater and faster liver growth as seen at CT in participants with liver cancer, compared with portal vein embolization with polyvinyl alcohol particles plus coils, allowing for earlier surgical intervention.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85107090405&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1148/radiol.2021204055
DO - 10.1148/radiol.2021204055
M3 - Article
C2 - 33825512
AN - SCOPUS:85107090405
SN - 0033-8419
VL - 299
SP - 715
EP - 724
JO - Radiology
JF - Radiology
IS - 3
ER -