Beliefs and attitudes towards the influenza vaccine in high-risk individuals

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Societal and economic impact of influenza is mainly due to influenza infection of specific groups, who are at higher risk of health complications leading up to hospitalisation or death. In this study we applied the health belief model (HBM) to evaluate beliefs and attitudes towards influenza disease and vaccine in community-dwelling high-risk individuals (aged 65 or more or having a chronic disease). We conducted a mixed-method study using data collected through a telephone survey of a household unit sample. We used thematic analysis to map responses to HBM dimensions and Poisson regression to model vaccine non-uptake prevalence. The main self-reported reason not to take the vaccine referred to the susceptibility dimension: ‘considering oneself to be a healthy person’ (29·8%, (95% confidence interval (CI) 22·1–38·7)). Bad experiences after vaccination – barriers dimension – were also commonly reported (17·0%, (95% CI 10·8–23·8)). Vaccine non-uptake prevalence was 22% higher in those who did not consider themselves susceptible to contract flu (Prevalence Ratio (PR) = 1·22, (95% CI 1·0–1·5)) and 18% lower in those who did not consider that the vaccine causes flu symptoms (PR = 0·82, (95% CI 0·68–0·99)). Results suggest that high-risk individuals do not think of themselves susceptible to influenza infection and fear adverse events following immunisation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1786-1796
Number of pages11
JournalEpidemiology and Infection
Volume145
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 24 Apr 2017

Fingerprint

Influenza Vaccines
Confidence Intervals
Human Influenza
Vaccines
Health
Independent Living
Infection
Telephone
Fear
Immunization
Vaccination
Hospitalization
Chronic Disease
Economics

Keywords

  • Chronic disease
  • elderly
  • health belief model
  • high-risk
  • influenza vaccine
  • vaccine non-uptake

Cite this

@article{d964be0d222b495b8ae0d6153a8e1ac1,
title = "Beliefs and attitudes towards the influenza vaccine in high-risk individuals",
abstract = "Societal and economic impact of influenza is mainly due to influenza infection of specific groups, who are at higher risk of health complications leading up to hospitalisation or death. In this study we applied the health belief model (HBM) to evaluate beliefs and attitudes towards influenza disease and vaccine in community-dwelling high-risk individuals (aged 65 or more or having a chronic disease). We conducted a mixed-method study using data collected through a telephone survey of a household unit sample. We used thematic analysis to map responses to HBM dimensions and Poisson regression to model vaccine non-uptake prevalence. The main self-reported reason not to take the vaccine referred to the susceptibility dimension: ‘considering oneself to be a healthy person’ (29·8{\%}, (95{\%} confidence interval (CI) 22·1–38·7)). Bad experiences after vaccination – barriers dimension – were also commonly reported (17·0{\%}, (95{\%} CI 10·8–23·8)). Vaccine non-uptake prevalence was 22{\%} higher in those who did not consider themselves susceptible to contract flu (Prevalence Ratio (PR) = 1·22, (95{\%} CI 1·0–1·5)) and 18{\%} lower in those who did not consider that the vaccine causes flu symptoms (PR = 0·82, (95{\%} CI 0·68–0·99)). Results suggest that high-risk individuals do not think of themselves susceptible to influenza infection and fear adverse events following immunisation.",
keywords = "Chronic disease, elderly, health belief model, high-risk, influenza vaccine, vaccine non-uptake",
author = "Santos, {A. J.} and I Kislaya and A. Machado and B. Nunes",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1017/S0950268817000814",
language = "English",
volume = "145",
pages = "1786--1796",
journal = "Epidemiology and Infection",
issn = "0950-2688",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "9",

}

Beliefs and attitudes towards the influenza vaccine in high-risk individuals. / Santos, A. J.; Kislaya, I; Machado, A.; Nunes, B.

In: Epidemiology and Infection, Vol. 145, No. 9, 24.04.2017, p. 1786-1796.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beliefs and attitudes towards the influenza vaccine in high-risk individuals

AU - Santos, A. J.

AU - Kislaya, I

AU - Machado, A.

AU - Nunes, B.

PY - 2017/4/24

Y1 - 2017/4/24

N2 - Societal and economic impact of influenza is mainly due to influenza infection of specific groups, who are at higher risk of health complications leading up to hospitalisation or death. In this study we applied the health belief model (HBM) to evaluate beliefs and attitudes towards influenza disease and vaccine in community-dwelling high-risk individuals (aged 65 or more or having a chronic disease). We conducted a mixed-method study using data collected through a telephone survey of a household unit sample. We used thematic analysis to map responses to HBM dimensions and Poisson regression to model vaccine non-uptake prevalence. The main self-reported reason not to take the vaccine referred to the susceptibility dimension: ‘considering oneself to be a healthy person’ (29·8%, (95% confidence interval (CI) 22·1–38·7)). Bad experiences after vaccination – barriers dimension – were also commonly reported (17·0%, (95% CI 10·8–23·8)). Vaccine non-uptake prevalence was 22% higher in those who did not consider themselves susceptible to contract flu (Prevalence Ratio (PR) = 1·22, (95% CI 1·0–1·5)) and 18% lower in those who did not consider that the vaccine causes flu symptoms (PR = 0·82, (95% CI 0·68–0·99)). Results suggest that high-risk individuals do not think of themselves susceptible to influenza infection and fear adverse events following immunisation.

AB - Societal and economic impact of influenza is mainly due to influenza infection of specific groups, who are at higher risk of health complications leading up to hospitalisation or death. In this study we applied the health belief model (HBM) to evaluate beliefs and attitudes towards influenza disease and vaccine in community-dwelling high-risk individuals (aged 65 or more or having a chronic disease). We conducted a mixed-method study using data collected through a telephone survey of a household unit sample. We used thematic analysis to map responses to HBM dimensions and Poisson regression to model vaccine non-uptake prevalence. The main self-reported reason not to take the vaccine referred to the susceptibility dimension: ‘considering oneself to be a healthy person’ (29·8%, (95% confidence interval (CI) 22·1–38·7)). Bad experiences after vaccination – barriers dimension – were also commonly reported (17·0%, (95% CI 10·8–23·8)). Vaccine non-uptake prevalence was 22% higher in those who did not consider themselves susceptible to contract flu (Prevalence Ratio (PR) = 1·22, (95% CI 1·0–1·5)) and 18% lower in those who did not consider that the vaccine causes flu symptoms (PR = 0·82, (95% CI 0·68–0·99)). Results suggest that high-risk individuals do not think of themselves susceptible to influenza infection and fear adverse events following immunisation.

KW - Chronic disease

KW - elderly

KW - health belief model

KW - high-risk

KW - influenza vaccine

KW - vaccine non-uptake

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018845367&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0950268817000814

DO - 10.1017/S0950268817000814

M3 - Article

VL - 145

SP - 1786

EP - 1796

JO - Epidemiology and Infection

JF - Epidemiology and Infection

SN - 0950-2688

IS - 9

ER -