TY - JOUR
T1 - Barriers and facilitators to cervical cancer screening among under-screened women in Cuenca, Ecuador
T2 - the perspectives of women and health professionals
AU - Vega Crespo, Bernardo
AU - Neira, Vivian Alejandra
AU - Ortíz Segarra, José
AU - Andrade, Andrés
AU - Guerra, Gabriela
AU - Ortiz, Stalin
AU - Flores, Antonieta
AU - Mora, Lorena
AU - Verhoeven, Veronique
AU - Gama, Ana
AU - Dias, Sónia
AU - Verberckmoes, Bo
AU - Vermandere, Heleen
AU - Michelsen, Kristien
AU - Degomme, Olivier
N1 - Funding Information:
We are grateful to all the participants who provided their knowledge. Our sincere thanks go to all the health professionals and women. We also thank the institutions that have supported us: Ghent University, Universidad Nova Lisboa, Universidad de Cuenca, Vicerrectorado de Investigación de la Universidad de Cuenca (VIUC), Sociedad de Lucha Contra el Cáncer (SOLCA) and the Municipality of Cuenca through the Hospital Municipal.
Funding Information:
This paper is an output from the project ‘EarLy dEtection of cerVical cAncer in hard-to-reach populations of women through portable and point-of-care HPV Testing’. The ELEVATE project is supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation Action (project number 825747).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - Background: Cervical cancer screening is a cost-effective method responsible for reducing cervical cancer-related mortality by 70% in countries that have achieved high coverage through nationwide screening strategies. However, there are disparities in access to screening. In Ecuador, although cervical cancer is the second most common cancer in women, only 58.4% of women of reproductive age have ever been screened for cervical cancer. Methodology: A qualitative study was performed to understand the current barriers to screening and to identify strategies that could increase uptake in Azuay province, Ecuador. Seven focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with under-screened women and health professionals (HPs). The FGDs were recorded and transcribed. Content analysis was done using the socio-ecological framework to categorize and analyse the data. Results: Overall, 28 women and 27 HPs participated in the study. The two groups perceived different barriers to cervical cancer screening. The HPs considered barriers to be mainly at the policy level (lack of a structured screening plan; lack of health promotion) and the individual level (lack of risk perception; personal beliefs). The women identified barriers mainly at organizational level, such as long waiting times, lack of access to health centres, and inadequate patient–physician communication. Both groups mentioned facilitators at policy level, such as national campaigns promoting cervical cancer screening, and at community and individual level, including health literacy and women’s empowerment. Conclusions: The women considered access to health services the main barrier to screening, while the HPs identified a lack of investment in screening programmes and cultural patterns at the community level as major obstacles. To take an integrated approach to cervical cancer prevention, the perspectives of both groups should be taken into account. Additionally, new strategies and technologies, such as self-administered human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and community participation, should be implemented to increase access to cervical cancer screening.
AB - Background: Cervical cancer screening is a cost-effective method responsible for reducing cervical cancer-related mortality by 70% in countries that have achieved high coverage through nationwide screening strategies. However, there are disparities in access to screening. In Ecuador, although cervical cancer is the second most common cancer in women, only 58.4% of women of reproductive age have ever been screened for cervical cancer. Methodology: A qualitative study was performed to understand the current barriers to screening and to identify strategies that could increase uptake in Azuay province, Ecuador. Seven focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with under-screened women and health professionals (HPs). The FGDs were recorded and transcribed. Content analysis was done using the socio-ecological framework to categorize and analyse the data. Results: Overall, 28 women and 27 HPs participated in the study. The two groups perceived different barriers to cervical cancer screening. The HPs considered barriers to be mainly at the policy level (lack of a structured screening plan; lack of health promotion) and the individual level (lack of risk perception; personal beliefs). The women identified barriers mainly at organizational level, such as long waiting times, lack of access to health centres, and inadequate patient–physician communication. Both groups mentioned facilitators at policy level, such as national campaigns promoting cervical cancer screening, and at community and individual level, including health literacy and women’s empowerment. Conclusions: The women considered access to health services the main barrier to screening, while the HPs identified a lack of investment in screening programmes and cultural patterns at the community level as major obstacles. To take an integrated approach to cervical cancer prevention, the perspectives of both groups should be taken into account. Additionally, new strategies and technologies, such as self-administered human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and community participation, should be implemented to increase access to cervical cancer screening.
KW - Barriers and facilitators
KW - Cervical cancer
KW - Ecuador
KW - HPV
KW - Screening
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85142254976&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12889-022-14601-y
DO - 10.1186/s12889-022-14601-y
M3 - Article
C2 - 36414955
AN - SCOPUS:85142254976
SN - 1471-2458
VL - 22
JO - BMC Public Health
JF - BMC Public Health
IS - 1
M1 - 2144
ER -