TY - JOUR
T1 - Association between sacubitril/valsartan initiation and changes in left ventricular ejection fraction
T2 - Insights from ARIADNE registry
AU - the ARIADNE investigators
AU - Lund, Lars H.
AU - Zeymer, Uwe
AU - Clark, Andrew L.
AU - Barrios, Vivencio
AU - Damy, Thibaud
AU - Drożdż, Jaroslaw
AU - Fonseca, Candida
AU - Kalus, Stefanie
AU - Ferber, Philippe C.
AU - Koch, Cornelia
AU - Maggioni, Aldo P.
N1 - Funding Information:
LHL reports research grants from AstraZeneca, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Vifor-Fresenius, and Boston Scientific; consulting or speaker's honoraria from AstraZeneca, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Vifor-Fresenius, Bayer, Pharmacosmos, Abbott, Sanofi, Merck, Myokardia, Orion Pharma, MedScape, Radcliffe Cardiology, Lexicon, and Respicardia; and stock ownership in AnaCardio; outside the submitted work. UZ has received research funding as well as speaker and consulting honoraria from Novartis. ALC has received funding for travel to meetings from Novartis as well as unrestricted grants for the support of his department. VB has received funding for travel to meetings from Novartis as well as fees for lectures and unrestricted grants for clinical research. JD has received honoraria for participation in committees of studies sponsored by Novartis . CF has received speaker fees and honoraria for consulting from Novartis, Servier, Bayer, OMPharma, and Daiichi Sankyo. SK is an employee of GKM (clinical research organization) contracted for data analysis by Novartis. PCF and CK are employees of Novartis. APM has received personal fees for participation in study committees of trials funded by Novartis, Bayer, Cardiorentis, and Fresenius.
Funding Information:
LHL reports research grants from AstraZeneca, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Vifor-Fresenius, and Boston Scientific; consulting or speaker's honoraria from AstraZeneca, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Vifor-Fresenius, Bayer, Pharmacosmos, Abbott, Sanofi, Merck, Myokardia, Orion Pharma, MedScape, Radcliffe Cardiology, Lexicon, and Respicardia; and stock ownership in AnaCardio; outside the submitted work. UZ has received research funding as well as speaker and consulting honoraria from Novartis. ALC has received funding for travel to meetings from Novartis as well as unrestricted grants for the support of his department. VB has received funding for travel to meetings from Novartis as well as fees for lectures and unrestricted grants for clinical research. JD has received honoraria for participation in committees of studies sponsored by Novartis. CF has received speaker fees and honoraria for consulting from Novartis, Servier, Bayer, OMPharma, and Daiichi Sankyo. SK is an employee of GKM (clinical research organization) contracted for data analysis by Novartis. PCF and CK are employees of Novartis. APM has received personal fees for participation in study committees of trials funded by Novartis, Bayer, Cardiorentis, and Fresenius.This work was supported by Novartis Pharma AG.
Funding Information:
This work was supported by Novartis Pharma AG.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2023/1/1
Y1 - 2023/1/1
N2 - Aims: We tested the hypothesis that initiation versus non-initiation of sacubitril/valsartan is associated with a more favorable subsequent change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in a real-world setting. Methods: A prospective, non-randomized, double-arm, open-label, cohort study had been conducted across 687 centers in 17 European countries enrolling HFrEF patients aged ≥18 years with symptoms of HF (New York Heart Association [NYHA] II–IV) and “reduced LVEF”. For the current analysis, 2602 patients with LVEF measured at baseline and follow-up were chosen, of which 860 (33%, mean age 67 years, 26% women) were started on sacubitril/valsartan at baseline and 1742 (67%, 68 years, 23% women) were not. Patients started on sacubitril/valsartan had higher NYHA class and lower LVEF. Results: LVEF increased from mean 32.7% to 38.1% in the sacubitril/valsartan group versus from 35.9% to 38.7% in the non-sacubitril/valsartan group (mean difference in increase 2.6%, p < 0.001). LVEF increased from baseline in 64% versus 53% of patients and increased by ≥5% (absolute %) in 50% versus 35% of patients in the sacubitril/valsartan versus non-sacubitril/valsartan groups, respectively. In the overall cohort, initiation of sacubitril/valsartan was independently associated with any increase in LVEF (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.49 [1.26–1.75]) and with increase by ≥5% (OR 1.65 [1.39–1.95]). Conclusion: Initiating versus not initiating sacubitril/valsartan was independently associated with a greater subsequent increase in LVEF in this real-world setting. Reverse cardiac remodeling may be one mechanism of benefit of sacubitril/valsartan.
AB - Aims: We tested the hypothesis that initiation versus non-initiation of sacubitril/valsartan is associated with a more favorable subsequent change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in a real-world setting. Methods: A prospective, non-randomized, double-arm, open-label, cohort study had been conducted across 687 centers in 17 European countries enrolling HFrEF patients aged ≥18 years with symptoms of HF (New York Heart Association [NYHA] II–IV) and “reduced LVEF”. For the current analysis, 2602 patients with LVEF measured at baseline and follow-up were chosen, of which 860 (33%, mean age 67 years, 26% women) were started on sacubitril/valsartan at baseline and 1742 (67%, 68 years, 23% women) were not. Patients started on sacubitril/valsartan had higher NYHA class and lower LVEF. Results: LVEF increased from mean 32.7% to 38.1% in the sacubitril/valsartan group versus from 35.9% to 38.7% in the non-sacubitril/valsartan group (mean difference in increase 2.6%, p < 0.001). LVEF increased from baseline in 64% versus 53% of patients and increased by ≥5% (absolute %) in 50% versus 35% of patients in the sacubitril/valsartan versus non-sacubitril/valsartan groups, respectively. In the overall cohort, initiation of sacubitril/valsartan was independently associated with any increase in LVEF (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.49 [1.26–1.75]) and with increase by ≥5% (OR 1.65 [1.39–1.95]). Conclusion: Initiating versus not initiating sacubitril/valsartan was independently associated with a greater subsequent increase in LVEF in this real-world setting. Reverse cardiac remodeling may be one mechanism of benefit of sacubitril/valsartan.
KW - Heart failure
KW - Left ventricular ejection fraction
KW - Real-world
KW - Reverse cardiac remodeling
KW - Sacubitril/valsartan
KW - Trial registration: EUPAS 13835.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85139727014&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.10.012
DO - 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.10.012
M3 - Article
C2 - 36216094
AN - SCOPUS:85139727014
SN - 0167-5273
VL - 370
SP - 279
EP - 286
JO - International Journal of Cardiology
JF - International Journal of Cardiology
ER -