Assessing relevance

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper advances an approach to relevance grounded on patterns of material inference called argumentation schemes, which can account for the reconstruction and the evaluation of relevance relations. In order to account for relevance in different types of dialogical contexts, pursuing also non-cognitive goals, and measuring the scalar strength of relevance, communicative acts are conceived as dialogue moves, whose coherence with the previous ones or the context is represented as the conclusion of steps of material inferences. Such inferences are described using argumentation schemes and are evaluated by considering (1) their defeasibility, and (2) the acceptability of the implicit premises on which they are based. The assessment of both the relevance of an utterance and the strength thereof depends on the evaluation of three interrelated factors: (1) number of inferential steps required; (2) the types of argumentation schemes involved; and (3) the implicit premises required.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)42-64
Number of pages23
JournalLingua
Volume210-211
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2018

Fingerprint

argumentation
evaluation
reconstruction
dialogue
Argumentation Schemes
Inference
Evaluation

Keywords

  • Argumentation
  • Argumentation schemes
  • Coherence
  • Discourse analysis
  • Inference
  • Pragmatics
  • Relevance

Cite this

Macagno, Fabrizio. / Assessing relevance. In: Lingua. 2018 ; Vol. 210-211. pp. 42-64.
@article{3b37eab4547e4cd6bad3c7e6c87693a7,
title = "Assessing relevance",
abstract = "This paper advances an approach to relevance grounded on patterns of material inference called argumentation schemes, which can account for the reconstruction and the evaluation of relevance relations. In order to account for relevance in different types of dialogical contexts, pursuing also non-cognitive goals, and measuring the scalar strength of relevance, communicative acts are conceived as dialogue moves, whose coherence with the previous ones or the context is represented as the conclusion of steps of material inferences. Such inferences are described using argumentation schemes and are evaluated by considering (1) their defeasibility, and (2) the acceptability of the implicit premises on which they are based. The assessment of both the relevance of an utterance and the strength thereof depends on the evaluation of three interrelated factors: (1) number of inferential steps required; (2) the types of argumentation schemes involved; and (3) the implicit premises required.",
keywords = "Argumentation, Argumentation schemes, Coherence, Discourse analysis, Inference, Pragmatics, Relevance",
author = "Fabrizio Macagno",
note = "info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/5876/147240/PT# UID/FIL/00183/2013 IF/00945/2013 PTDC/IVC-HFC/1817/2014 PTDC/MHC-FIL/0521/2014",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.lingua.2018.04.007",
language = "English",
volume = "210-211",
pages = "42--64",
journal = "Lingua",
issn = "0024-3841",
publisher = "Elsevier Science B.V., Inc",

}

Assessing relevance. / Macagno, Fabrizio.

In: Lingua, Vol. 210-211, 01.07.2018, p. 42-64.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing relevance

AU - Macagno, Fabrizio

N1 - info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/5876/147240/PT# UID/FIL/00183/2013 IF/00945/2013 PTDC/IVC-HFC/1817/2014 PTDC/MHC-FIL/0521/2014

PY - 2018/7/1

Y1 - 2018/7/1

N2 - This paper advances an approach to relevance grounded on patterns of material inference called argumentation schemes, which can account for the reconstruction and the evaluation of relevance relations. In order to account for relevance in different types of dialogical contexts, pursuing also non-cognitive goals, and measuring the scalar strength of relevance, communicative acts are conceived as dialogue moves, whose coherence with the previous ones or the context is represented as the conclusion of steps of material inferences. Such inferences are described using argumentation schemes and are evaluated by considering (1) their defeasibility, and (2) the acceptability of the implicit premises on which they are based. The assessment of both the relevance of an utterance and the strength thereof depends on the evaluation of three interrelated factors: (1) number of inferential steps required; (2) the types of argumentation schemes involved; and (3) the implicit premises required.

AB - This paper advances an approach to relevance grounded on patterns of material inference called argumentation schemes, which can account for the reconstruction and the evaluation of relevance relations. In order to account for relevance in different types of dialogical contexts, pursuing also non-cognitive goals, and measuring the scalar strength of relevance, communicative acts are conceived as dialogue moves, whose coherence with the previous ones or the context is represented as the conclusion of steps of material inferences. Such inferences are described using argumentation schemes and are evaluated by considering (1) their defeasibility, and (2) the acceptability of the implicit premises on which they are based. The assessment of both the relevance of an utterance and the strength thereof depends on the evaluation of three interrelated factors: (1) number of inferential steps required; (2) the types of argumentation schemes involved; and (3) the implicit premises required.

KW - Argumentation

KW - Argumentation schemes

KW - Coherence

KW - Discourse analysis

KW - Inference

KW - Pragmatics

KW - Relevance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046141191&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.lingua.2018.04.007

DO - 10.1016/j.lingua.2018.04.007

M3 - Article

VL - 210-211

SP - 42

EP - 64

JO - Lingua

JF - Lingua

SN - 0024-3841

ER -