TY - GEN
T1 - Assessing adverse events in Madeira primary health care
AU - Ornelas, Marta Dora
AU - Sousa, Paulo
PY - 2019/1/1
Y1 - 2019/1/1
N2 - In last three decades, several epidemiological studies have been developed in order to assess the magnitude, nature and type of adverse events (AEs). Most of these studies focus on hospital settings, where the activities are more standardised, but simultaneously more complex and involving higher risks. However, in the last years, there is a growing movement and strong evidence that point out the importance of studying other healthcare contexts, such as primary care and long-term care. In Portugal, studies on primary care setting are scarce and still in the early stages. In this article, the authors describe the AEs assessment in Portuguese Primary Health Care (PHC) units in Madeira Island/Portugal. This study was quantitative, cross-sectional, observational and analytical, with probability sampling. We quantify and analyse the AEs registered by healthcare providers using the APEAS-PT formulary. A link to the APEAS–PT form was sent to 520 healthcare professionals (111 specialist in Family Medicine, 27 medical students, 382 nurses) who worked in 32 PHC centres. These professionals identified and analysed 85 AEs and 42 incidents, which corresponds to a prevalence of 3.9 AEs per 10,000 visits, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) between 3.7 and 4 AE. Most of the AEs were preventable (96%). The most frequent causal factors of AEs were associated with medication (69%), health care provided to users (54%), communication (41%) and diagnosis (22%). This analysis of AEs in Madeira island PHC contributed to reinforce patient safety culture and to better understand quaternary prevention.
AB - In last three decades, several epidemiological studies have been developed in order to assess the magnitude, nature and type of adverse events (AEs). Most of these studies focus on hospital settings, where the activities are more standardised, but simultaneously more complex and involving higher risks. However, in the last years, there is a growing movement and strong evidence that point out the importance of studying other healthcare contexts, such as primary care and long-term care. In Portugal, studies on primary care setting are scarce and still in the early stages. In this article, the authors describe the AEs assessment in Portuguese Primary Health Care (PHC) units in Madeira Island/Portugal. This study was quantitative, cross-sectional, observational and analytical, with probability sampling. We quantify and analyse the AEs registered by healthcare providers using the APEAS-PT formulary. A link to the APEAS–PT form was sent to 520 healthcare professionals (111 specialist in Family Medicine, 27 medical students, 382 nurses) who worked in 32 PHC centres. These professionals identified and analysed 85 AEs and 42 incidents, which corresponds to a prevalence of 3.9 AEs per 10,000 visits, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) between 3.7 and 4 AE. Most of the AEs were preventable (96%). The most frequent causal factors of AEs were associated with medication (69%), health care provided to users (54%), communication (41%) and diagnosis (22%). This analysis of AEs in Madeira island PHC contributed to reinforce patient safety culture and to better understand quaternary prevention.
KW - Adverse events
KW - Patient safety
KW - Primary Health Care
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068619078&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-24067-7_23
DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-24067-7_23
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85068619078
SN - 9783030240660
T3 - Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing
SP - 197
EP - 204
BT - Health and social care systems of the future
A2 - Cotrim, Teresa Patrone
A2 - Serranheira, Florentino
A2 - Sousa, Paulo
A2 - Hignett, Sue
A2 - Albolino, Sara
A2 - Tartaglia, Riccardo
PB - Springer Verlag
T2 - International Conference on Healthcare Ergonomics and Patient Safety, HEPS 2019
Y2 - 3 July 2019 through 5 July 2019
ER -