ARNIs: balancing "the good and the bad" of neuroendocrine response to HF

Roberto Ferrari, J Cardoso, M C Fonseca, C Aguiar, J I Moreira, A Fucili, C Rapezzi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)


BACKGROUND: A new class of drugs-angiotensin receptor, neprylisin inhibitors, ARNI-has shown to be prognostic superior in HFrEF to the sole inhibition of the renin-angiotensin axes with enalapril. The ultimate mechanism of action of ARNIs is unknown.

AIM: We have considered that ARNI exerts a positive modulation of the neuroendocrine balance, with enhancement of the physiological diuresis and dilatation due to neprylisin inhibition by sacubitril. This represents a shift in HF medical therapy always directed to counteract (with inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system, beta blockers or inhibitors of aldosterone) the so-called "bad" neuroendocrine response. Development of ARNI, on the contrary, has led to consider the neuroendocrine response to HFrEF from a different angle, which is to say that the activation is not always deleterious, but it could also be beneficial. This concept is highlighted by the enhancement of the activity of atrial natriuretic peptide, induced by sacubitril/valsartan in the PARADIGM trial, and found as proof from early studies on untreated patients with constrictive pericarditis. The possibility that sacubitril inhibition of neprylisin acts by enhancing substance P and gene-related calcitonin peptide is also considered, as well as the negative effect of neprylisin inhibition.

CONCLUSIONS: The beneficial effects of ARNI are related, in part at least, to a positive modulation of the neuroendocrine response to the disease, resulting in an increase of physiological diuresis and dilatation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)599-610
JournalClinical Research in Cardiology
Issue number5
Early online date17 Sep 2019
Publication statusPublished - May 2020


  • ARNI
  • HF
  • Sacubitril
  • Valsartan


Dive into the research topics of 'ARNIs: balancing "the good and the bad" of neuroendocrine response to HF'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this