Are victims to blame? Youth, gender and moral discourse on online risk

Ana Jorge, Lorleen Farrugia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article takes a discourse analysis frame to understand how young people’s norms and moral evaluations of their practices on digital media are culturally negotiated between their own and their peers’ experiences, parental concerns, awareness programmes and media representations. It draws on focus groups and interviews with 171 participants aged 13–16 from nine European countries, analysing how young people position themselves towards online experiences, particularly bullying, sexual communication and contact. While teenagers can sympathize with victims of bullying, especially if they perceive them as vulnerable, they can blame older teenagers, girls or parents for initiating or being co-responsible for risks young victims are involved in. They are judged as in failing, when they choose to not comply with self-protection and self-vigilance (Giddens 1991, Dobson and Ringrose 2015, Gill and Scharf 2011), which can be detected in young people’s moral discourses as a successful way of being and behaving online
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)285-301
JournalCatalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies
Volume9
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2017

Keywords

  • discourse
  • online risk
  • digital media
  • cross-cultural
  • young people
  • responsibility

Cite this

@article{417782830aa54af9aad5e096d16395e1,
title = "Are victims to blame? Youth, gender and moral discourse on online risk",
abstract = "This article takes a discourse analysis frame to understand how young people’s norms and moral evaluations of their practices on digital media are culturally negotiated between their own and their peers’ experiences, parental concerns, awareness programmes and media representations. It draws on focus groups and interviews with 171 participants aged 13–16 from nine European countries, analysing how young people position themselves towards online experiences, particularly bullying, sexual communication and contact. While teenagers can sympathize with victims of bullying, especially if they perceive them as vulnerable, they can blame older teenagers, girls or parents for initiating or being co-responsible for risks young victims are involved in. They are judged as in failing, when they choose to not comply with self-protection and self-vigilance (Giddens 1991, Dobson and Ringrose 2015, Gill and Scharf 2011), which can be detected in young people’s moral discourses as a successful way of being and behaving online",
keywords = "discourse, online risk, digital media, cross-cultural, young people, responsibility",
author = "Ana Jorge and Lorleen Farrugia",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1386/cjcs.9.2.285_1",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "285--301",
journal = "Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies",
issn = "1757-1898",
publisher = "Intellect",
number = "2",

}

Are victims to blame? Youth, gender and moral discourse on online risk. / Jorge, Ana; Farrugia, Lorleen.

In: Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies, Vol. 9, No. 2, 01.10.2017, p. 285-301.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are victims to blame? Youth, gender and moral discourse on online risk

AU - Jorge, Ana

AU - Farrugia, Lorleen

PY - 2017/10/1

Y1 - 2017/10/1

N2 - This article takes a discourse analysis frame to understand how young people’s norms and moral evaluations of their practices on digital media are culturally negotiated between their own and their peers’ experiences, parental concerns, awareness programmes and media representations. It draws on focus groups and interviews with 171 participants aged 13–16 from nine European countries, analysing how young people position themselves towards online experiences, particularly bullying, sexual communication and contact. While teenagers can sympathize with victims of bullying, especially if they perceive them as vulnerable, they can blame older teenagers, girls or parents for initiating or being co-responsible for risks young victims are involved in. They are judged as in failing, when they choose to not comply with self-protection and self-vigilance (Giddens 1991, Dobson and Ringrose 2015, Gill and Scharf 2011), which can be detected in young people’s moral discourses as a successful way of being and behaving online

AB - This article takes a discourse analysis frame to understand how young people’s norms and moral evaluations of their practices on digital media are culturally negotiated between their own and their peers’ experiences, parental concerns, awareness programmes and media representations. It draws on focus groups and interviews with 171 participants aged 13–16 from nine European countries, analysing how young people position themselves towards online experiences, particularly bullying, sexual communication and contact. While teenagers can sympathize with victims of bullying, especially if they perceive them as vulnerable, they can blame older teenagers, girls or parents for initiating or being co-responsible for risks young victims are involved in. They are judged as in failing, when they choose to not comply with self-protection and self-vigilance (Giddens 1991, Dobson and Ringrose 2015, Gill and Scharf 2011), which can be detected in young people’s moral discourses as a successful way of being and behaving online

KW - discourse

KW - online risk

KW - digital media

KW - cross-cultural

KW - young people

KW - responsibility

U2 - 10.1386/cjcs.9.2.285_1

DO - 10.1386/cjcs.9.2.285_1

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 285

EP - 301

JO - Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies

JF - Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies

SN - 1757-1898

IS - 2

ER -