Araucaria as a tool for diagramming arguments in teaching and studying philosophy

Glenn Rowe, Fabrizio Macagno, Chris Reed, Douglas Walton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper explains how to use a new software tool for argument diagramming available free on the Internet, showing especially how it can be used in the classroom to enhance critical thinking in philosophy. The user loads a text file containing an argument into a box on the computer interface, and then creates an argument diagram by dragging lines (representing inferences) from one node (proposition) to another. A key feature is the support for argumentation schemes, common patterns of defeasible reasoning historically know as topics (topoi). Several examples are presented, as well as the results of an experiment in using the system with students in a university classroom.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)111-124
Number of pages14
JournalTeaching Philosophy
Volume29
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Araucaria as a tool for diagramming arguments in teaching and studying philosophy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this