TY - JOUR
T1 - Analyzing dialogue moves in chronic care communication
T2 - Dialogical intentions and customization of recommendations for the assessment of medical deliberation
AU - Macagno, Fabrizio
AU - Bigi, Sarah
N1 - UIDB/00183/2020
UIDP/00183/2020
PTDC/FER‐FIL/28278/2017
PTDC/MHC-FIL/0521/2014
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Dialogue moves are a pragmatic instrument that captures the most important categories of “dialogical intentions.” This paper adapts this tool to the conversational setting of chronic care communication, characterized by the general goal of making reasoned decisions concerning patients’ conditions, shared by the latter. 7 mutually exclusive and comprehensive categories were identified, whose reliability was tested on an Italian corpus of provider-patient encounters in diabetes care. The application of this method was illustrated through explorative analyses identifying possible correlations between the dialogical structure of medical interviews and one of the indicators of personalized decision-making, namely the specificity of the recommendations given by the provider (“customization”). The statistical analyses show a significant correlation between the exchange of personal information and very specific and customized recommendations for change. It suggests how the creation of common ground, exceeding the boundaries of the paternalistic or patient-centered models, can lead to highly effective communication.
AB - Dialogue moves are a pragmatic instrument that captures the most important categories of “dialogical intentions.” This paper adapts this tool to the conversational setting of chronic care communication, characterized by the general goal of making reasoned decisions concerning patients’ conditions, shared by the latter. 7 mutually exclusive and comprehensive categories were identified, whose reliability was tested on an Italian corpus of provider-patient encounters in diabetes care. The application of this method was illustrated through explorative analyses identifying possible correlations between the dialogical structure of medical interviews and one of the indicators of personalized decision-making, namely the specificity of the recommendations given by the provider (“customization”). The statistical analyses show a significant correlation between the exchange of personal information and very specific and customized recommendations for change. It suggests how the creation of common ground, exceeding the boundaries of the paternalistic or patient-centered models, can lead to highly effective communication.
KW - chronic care
KW - dialogue moves
KW - dialogue
KW - health communication
KW - decision making
KW - discourse analysis
KW - pragmatics
UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85086672999&doi=10.1075%2fjaic.18044.mac&origin=inward&txGid=f6b849d118d2061f559ba1b79d760cea
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000585208400001
U2 - 10.1075/jaic.18044.mac
DO - 10.1075/jaic.18044.mac
M3 - Article
SN - 2211-4742
VL - 35
SP - 167
EP - 198
JO - Journal of Argumentation in Context
JF - Journal of Argumentation in Context
IS - 12
ER -