Analyzing competing demands in organizations: a systematic comparison

Medhanie Gaim, Nils Wåhlin, Miguel Pina e Cunha, Stewart Clegg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)
83 Downloads (Pure)


Organizational scholars have shown increasing interest in the ways in which managers enact and respond to competing demands and the tensions they prompt as constitutive elements of their organizations. There is now a proliferation of conceptualizations of such competing demands that can be somewhat confusing. We will enhance conceptual clarity by identifying seven constitutive empirical characteristics of competing demands: these consist of the existence of dyadic relations, contradiction, interrelatedness, complementarity, compatibility, simultaneity, and the existence of push-pull forces. We construct a comparative classification of competing demands using these characteristics as our distinguishing features. The result is a more nuanced understanding of how managers approach competing demands that can help scholars to minimize arbitrariness, interpret results, and compare contributions in the area in a much-needed step toward understanding and designing organizations.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Organization Design
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 5 Apr 2018


  • Competing demands
  • Organizational contradictions
  • Organizational design
  • Organizational tensions
  • Paradox theory


Dive into the research topics of 'Analyzing competing demands in organizations: a systematic comparison'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this