Analysis of the sporozoite ELISA for estimating infection rates in Mozambican anophelines

J. D. Charlwood, E. V. E. Tomás, N. Cuamba, J. Pinto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)


Comparisons were undertaken to investigate cost-effective methods of implementing the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for sporozoite determination in anophelines when large numbers require processing. Comparisons between ELISA plate reader and visual assessments were performed with Anopheles funestus and Anopheles gambiae s.l. (Diptera: Culicidae), as were comparisons between whole-body mosquito samples, heads and thoraces, and abdomens alone. Rates obtained from pools of five or 10 mosquitoes were compared with those for individual mosquitoes, as were rates obtained using different sampling methods. A total of 41792 An.funestus and 9431 An.gambiae s.l. collected in light traps, and 22323 An.funestus and 6860 An.gambiae s.l. from exit collections were analysed. Visual assessments gave results similar to those of machine readings. Sporozoite rates were similar in both species, as were rates by collection method. The use of whole mosquitoes increased estimates of infection rate by 0.6%. Pool size did not affect infection rates of An.gambiae s.l., but rates were higher among individually tested An.funestus than among those tested in pools. For large-scale surveys, the use of whole mosquitoes in pools of 10 mosquitoes, with correction for overestimation, and the noting of results according to a simple three-stage visual assessment of positivity is the most cost-effective approach and is sufficient to obtain reliable data for comparative purposes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)10-16
Number of pages7
JournalMedical and Veterinary Entomology
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2015


  • Anopheles funestus
  • Anopheles gambiae
  • Circumsporozoite-ELISA
  • Mozambique
  • Sporozoite


Dive into the research topics of 'Analysis of the sporozoite ELISA for estimating infection rates in Mozambican anophelines'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this