Algorithmic criminal justice: Is it just a science fiction plot idea?

Athina Sachoulidou

doi:10.1007/978-3-031-41081-9

Algorithmic criminal justice: Is it just a science fiction plot idea?

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review

Abstract

This chapter examines the use of algorithms in the realm of criminal justice (known as algorithmic criminal justice) and the potential paradigm shift towards pre-emption-driven decision-making. It contributes to debates about the increasing role of enabling technologies in understanding and responding to crime by turning the spotlight on criminal proceedings. It argues that, at first sight, algorithmic decision-making tools may present a strong potential to improve the operational efficiency of criminal justice authorities, but their use remains associated with hard-to-solve challenges, ranging from lack of transparency to questionable compatibility with core principles of substantive and procedural criminal law. Finally, it highlights the need for a balanced dialogue at the crossroads of technological novelty and (criminal) justice.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Artificial Intelligence and Normative Challenges pp 125–143
Editors	Georgios Nouskalis, Angelos Kornilakis, Vassilis Pergantis, Themistoklis Tzimas
Publisher	Springer Verlag
Pages	125-143
Number of pages	19
ISBN (Electronic)	978-3-031-41081-9
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41081-9 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41081-9_8
Publication status	Published - 2023

Keywords

Algorithms
Algorithmic justice
Criminal justice
Criminal liability
Due process
Risk Assessment

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1007/978-3-031-41081-9Licence: Unspecified
10.1007/978-3-031-41081-9_8Licence: Unspecified

Cite this

@inbook{01dc26b7c77d4ab1ba7db923944e2f01,

title = "Algorithmic criminal justice: Is it just a science fiction plot idea?",

abstract = "This chapter examines the use of algorithms in the realm of criminal justice (known as algorithmic criminal justice) and the potential paradigm shift towards pre-emption-driven decision-making. It contributes to debates about the increasing role of enabling technologies in understanding and responding to crime by turning the spotlight on criminal proceedings. It argues that, at first sight, algorithmic decision-making tools may present a strong potential to improve the operational efficiency of criminal justice authorities, but their use remains associated with hard-to-solve challenges, ranging from lack of transparency to questionable compatibility with core principles of substantive and procedural criminal law. Finally, it highlights the need for a balanced dialogue at the crossroads of technological novelty and (criminal) justice.",

keywords = "Algorithms, Algorithmic justice, Criminal justice, Criminal liability, Due process, Risk Assessment",

author = "Athina Sachoulidou",

year = "2023",

doi = "10.1007/978-3-031-41081-9",

language = "English",

pages = "125--143",

editor = "Georgios Nouskalis and Angelos Kornilakis and Vassilis Pergantis and Tzimas, {Themistoklis }",

booktitle = "Artificial Intelligence and Normative Challenges pp 125–143",

publisher = "Springer Verlag",

address = "Germany",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Algorithmic criminal justice

T2 - Is it just a science fiction plot idea?

AU - Sachoulidou, Athina

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - This chapter examines the use of algorithms in the realm of criminal justice (known as algorithmic criminal justice) and the potential paradigm shift towards pre-emption-driven decision-making. It contributes to debates about the increasing role of enabling technologies in understanding and responding to crime by turning the spotlight on criminal proceedings. It argues that, at first sight, algorithmic decision-making tools may present a strong potential to improve the operational efficiency of criminal justice authorities, but their use remains associated with hard-to-solve challenges, ranging from lack of transparency to questionable compatibility with core principles of substantive and procedural criminal law. Finally, it highlights the need for a balanced dialogue at the crossroads of technological novelty and (criminal) justice.

AB - This chapter examines the use of algorithms in the realm of criminal justice (known as algorithmic criminal justice) and the potential paradigm shift towards pre-emption-driven decision-making. It contributes to debates about the increasing role of enabling technologies in understanding and responding to crime by turning the spotlight on criminal proceedings. It argues that, at first sight, algorithmic decision-making tools may present a strong potential to improve the operational efficiency of criminal justice authorities, but their use remains associated with hard-to-solve challenges, ranging from lack of transparency to questionable compatibility with core principles of substantive and procedural criminal law. Finally, it highlights the need for a balanced dialogue at the crossroads of technological novelty and (criminal) justice.

KW - Algorithms

KW - Algorithmic justice

KW - Criminal justice

KW - Criminal liability

KW - Due process

KW - Risk Assessment

UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85178884450&origin=inward

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-031-41081-9

DO - 10.1007/978-3-031-41081-9

M3 - Chapter

SP - 125

EP - 143

BT - Artificial Intelligence and Normative Challenges pp 125–143

A2 - Nouskalis, Georgios

A2 - Kornilakis, Angelos

A2 - Pergantis, Vassilis

A2 - Tzimas, Themistoklis

PB - Springer Verlag

ER -

Algorithmic criminal justice: Is it just a science fiction plot idea?

Abstract

Keywords

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this