Abstract
Different disciplines within the art and heritage conservation field have been arguing to make the practice more transparent and collaborative. This chapter argues for the acknowledgement of the positionality of conservation processes. Drawing on feminist scholarship, the chapter will explore the ways in which a collaborative conservation discourse has been framed and how that impacts its ethical positioning. The modes of collaboration in a conservation discourse include consultation, collaboration, participation, and the intended or inherent sharing of decision-making processes. We will discuss how some of those framings consolidate with what the critical heritage studies scholar Laurajane Smith calls ‘authorised heritage discourses’ (AHDs). The process of thinking about those conservation discourses in relation to what the feminist epistemology has called affirmative ethics, we argue, contributes to resituating conservation practices more fairly, equally, and inclusively and helps unlearn preconceived perspectives about knowledge making.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Participatory Practices in Art and Cultural Heritage |
Subtitle of host publication | Learning Through and from Collaboration |
Editors | Christoph Rausch, Ruth Benschop, Emilie Sitzia, Vivian van Saaze |
Place of Publication | Cham |
Publisher | Springer |
Pages | 127-141 |
Number of pages | 15 |
ISBN (Print) | 978-3-031-05694-9 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2022 |
Keywords
- Heritage conservation
- Cultural heritage
- Museums
- Participatory practices
- Authorised heritage discourse
- Contemporary art
- Indigenous and World Cultures