Accommodating and confronting the Portuguese dictatorship within NATO, 1970-4

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)
24 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

During the early 1970s, NATO member-states such as Norway, Denmark, and the Netherlands repeatedly sought to use the Atlantic Alliance as a forum to confront Portuguese domestic and colonial policies. However, the larger members of the organisation - including the United States, the UK, France, and West Germany - successfully blocked their efforts. While the former expressed concern over the challenges posed by the Lisbon regime to NATO’s credibility at home and abroad, the latter sought to preserve their interests and institutional cohesion in view of the challenges posed by détente. This fault line reflected core differences in the allies’ perspectives about both Portugal and NATO itself. Drawing on extensive multi-archival research, this article examines the motivations and actions of various member-states on the North Atlantic Assembly and the NATO Council ministerial meetings. It reconsiders the international dimension of the Marcelo Caetano dictatorship and the connection between the cold war framework and the process of Portuguese resistance to decolonisation in Africa.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)505-526
Number of pages22
JournalThe International History Review
Volume38
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26 May 2016

Fingerprint

dictatorship
NATO
colonial policy
domestic policy
decolonization
allies
group cohesion
Denmark
Portugal
credibility
cold war
Norway
Netherlands
France
Federal Republic of Germany
regime
Dictatorship

Keywords

  • Cold war
  • Colonialism
  • Decolonisation
  • Détente
  • NATO
  • Portugal

Cite this

@article{eb6a758ab3344e8bbb36918dc30958ce,
title = "Accommodating and confronting the Portuguese dictatorship within NATO, 1970-4",
abstract = "During the early 1970s, NATO member-states such as Norway, Denmark, and the Netherlands repeatedly sought to use the Atlantic Alliance as a forum to confront Portuguese domestic and colonial policies. However, the larger members of the organisation - including the United States, the UK, France, and West Germany - successfully blocked their efforts. While the former expressed concern over the challenges posed by the Lisbon regime to NATO’s credibility at home and abroad, the latter sought to preserve their interests and institutional cohesion in view of the challenges posed by d{\'e}tente. This fault line reflected core differences in the allies’ perspectives about both Portugal and NATO itself. Drawing on extensive multi-archival research, this article examines the motivations and actions of various member-states on the North Atlantic Assembly and the NATO Council ministerial meetings. It reconsiders the international dimension of the Marcelo Caetano dictatorship and the connection between the cold war framework and the process of Portuguese resistance to decolonisation in Africa.",
keywords = "Cold war, Colonialism, Decolonisation, D{\'e}tente, NATO, Portugal",
author = "Rui Lopes",
note = "info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/5876/147250/PT# WOS:000379425200007 IF/01579/2015 UID/HIS/04209/2013",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "26",
doi = "10.1080/07075332.2015.1046388",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "505--526",
journal = "The International History Review",
issn = "1949-6540",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

Accommodating and confronting the Portuguese dictatorship within NATO, 1970-4. / Lopes, Rui.

In: The International History Review, Vol. 38, No. 3, 26.05.2016, p. 505-526.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accommodating and confronting the Portuguese dictatorship within NATO, 1970-4

AU - Lopes, Rui

N1 - info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/5876/147250/PT# WOS:000379425200007 IF/01579/2015 UID/HIS/04209/2013

PY - 2016/5/26

Y1 - 2016/5/26

N2 - During the early 1970s, NATO member-states such as Norway, Denmark, and the Netherlands repeatedly sought to use the Atlantic Alliance as a forum to confront Portuguese domestic and colonial policies. However, the larger members of the organisation - including the United States, the UK, France, and West Germany - successfully blocked their efforts. While the former expressed concern over the challenges posed by the Lisbon regime to NATO’s credibility at home and abroad, the latter sought to preserve their interests and institutional cohesion in view of the challenges posed by détente. This fault line reflected core differences in the allies’ perspectives about both Portugal and NATO itself. Drawing on extensive multi-archival research, this article examines the motivations and actions of various member-states on the North Atlantic Assembly and the NATO Council ministerial meetings. It reconsiders the international dimension of the Marcelo Caetano dictatorship and the connection between the cold war framework and the process of Portuguese resistance to decolonisation in Africa.

AB - During the early 1970s, NATO member-states such as Norway, Denmark, and the Netherlands repeatedly sought to use the Atlantic Alliance as a forum to confront Portuguese domestic and colonial policies. However, the larger members of the organisation - including the United States, the UK, France, and West Germany - successfully blocked their efforts. While the former expressed concern over the challenges posed by the Lisbon regime to NATO’s credibility at home and abroad, the latter sought to preserve their interests and institutional cohesion in view of the challenges posed by détente. This fault line reflected core differences in the allies’ perspectives about both Portugal and NATO itself. Drawing on extensive multi-archival research, this article examines the motivations and actions of various member-states on the North Atlantic Assembly and the NATO Council ministerial meetings. It reconsiders the international dimension of the Marcelo Caetano dictatorship and the connection between the cold war framework and the process of Portuguese resistance to decolonisation in Africa.

KW - Cold war

KW - Colonialism

KW - Decolonisation

KW - Détente

KW - NATO

KW - Portugal

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930347196&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/07075332.2015.1046388

DO - 10.1080/07075332.2015.1046388

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 505

EP - 526

JO - The International History Review

JF - The International History Review

SN - 1949-6540

IS - 3

ER -