Abstract
In this note I address two issues in Susan Edwards-McKie’s recent paper “The Cosmic Fragment: Härte des Logischen Zwangs und Unendliche Möglichkeit. Nachlass discoveries and Wittgenstein’s conception of generality and the infinite”. The first has to do with a “von Wright error” that Edwards- McKie found and that I show to have been ultimately corrected by von Wright. The second has to do with her interpretation of Wittgenstein’s reaction to Heraclitus’ idea that “everything flows”, one I interpret as purely grammatical and not as a substantial position in favour or against Heracliteanism, nor even as a third stance between this and Parmenideanism, as Edwards-McKie interestingly suggests.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 191-200 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Wittgenstein-Studien (Walter de Gruyter) |
Volume | 7 |
Issue number | 1 |
Publication status | Published - 20 Feb 2016 |