TY - JOUR
T1 - A standard set of person-centred outcomes for diabetes mellitus
T2 - results of an international and unified approach
AU - Nano, J.
AU - Carinci, F.
AU - Okunade, O.
AU - Whittaker, S.
AU - Walbaum, M.
AU - Barnard-Kelly, K.
AU - Barthelmes, D.
AU - Benson, T.
AU - Calderon-Margalit, R.
AU - Dennaoui, J.
AU - Fraser, S.
AU - Haig, R.
AU - Hernández-Jimenéz, S.
AU - Levitt, N.
AU - Mbanya, J. C.
AU - Naqvi, S.
AU - Peters, A. L.
AU - Peyrot, M.
AU - Prabhaharan, M.
AU - Pumerantz, A.
AU - Raposo, J.
AU - Santana, M.
AU - Schmitt, A.
AU - Skovlund, S. E.
AU - Garcia-Ulloa, A. C.
AU - Wee, H. L.
AU - Zaletel, J.
AU - Massi-Benedetti, M.
PY - 2020/12
Y1 - 2020/12
N2 - Aims: To select a core list of standard outcomes for diabetes to be routinely applied internationally, including patient-reported outcomes. Methods: We conducted a structured systematic review of outcome measures, focusing on adults with either type 1 or type 2 diabetes. This process was followed by a consensus-driven modified Delphi panel, including a multidisciplinary group of academics, health professionals and people with diabetes. External feedback to validate the set of outcome measures was sought from people with diabetes and health professionals. Results: The panel identified an essential set of clinical outcomes related to diabetes control, acute events, chronic complications, health service utilisation, and survival that can be measured using routine administrative data and/or clinical records. Three instruments were recommended for annual measurement of patient-reported outcome measures: the WHO Well-Being Index for psychological well-being; the depression module of the Patient Health Questionnaire for depression; and the Problem Areas in Diabetes scale for diabetes distress. A range of factors related to demographic, diagnostic profile, lifestyle, social support and treatment of diabetes were also identified for case-mix adjustment. Conclusions: We recommend the standard set identified in this study for use in routine practice to monitor, benchmark and improve diabetes care. The inclusion of patient-reported outcomes enables people living with diabetes to report directly on their condition in a structured way.
AB - Aims: To select a core list of standard outcomes for diabetes to be routinely applied internationally, including patient-reported outcomes. Methods: We conducted a structured systematic review of outcome measures, focusing on adults with either type 1 or type 2 diabetes. This process was followed by a consensus-driven modified Delphi panel, including a multidisciplinary group of academics, health professionals and people with diabetes. External feedback to validate the set of outcome measures was sought from people with diabetes and health professionals. Results: The panel identified an essential set of clinical outcomes related to diabetes control, acute events, chronic complications, health service utilisation, and survival that can be measured using routine administrative data and/or clinical records. Three instruments were recommended for annual measurement of patient-reported outcome measures: the WHO Well-Being Index for psychological well-being; the depression module of the Patient Health Questionnaire for depression; and the Problem Areas in Diabetes scale for diabetes distress. A range of factors related to demographic, diagnostic profile, lifestyle, social support and treatment of diabetes were also identified for case-mix adjustment. Conclusions: We recommend the standard set identified in this study for use in routine practice to monitor, benchmark and improve diabetes care. The inclusion of patient-reported outcomes enables people living with diabetes to report directly on their condition in a structured way.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85082716759&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/dme.14286
DO - 10.1111/dme.14286
M3 - Article
C2 - 32124488
AN - SCOPUS:85082716759
SN - 0742-3071
VL - 37
SP - 2009
EP - 2018
JO - Diabetic Medicine
JF - Diabetic Medicine
IS - 12
ER -
