TY - JOUR
T1 - A simplified single transseptal puncture approach using high-density 3D voltage mapping for atrial fibrillation ablation
T2 - acute complications and long-term results
AU - Silva Cunha, Pedro
AU - Teixeira, Bárbara Lacerda
AU - Laranjo, Sérgio
AU - Portugal, Guilherme
AU - Valente, Bruno
AU - Delgado, Ana Sofia
AU - Pereira, Mariana
AU - Rocha, António Condeixa
AU - Brás, Manuel
AU - Cruz, Madalena Coutinho
AU - Paulo, Margarida
AU - Lousinha, Ana
AU - Guerra, Cátia
AU - Ferreira, Rui Cruz
AU - Oliveira, Mário Martins
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Background: An ablation catheter and a circular mapping catheter requiring a double transeptal puncture (TSP) for left atrial access have been conventionally used for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Recently, different operators have combined a single transseptal puncture technique with 3D high-density mapping catheters for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Objective: This study aims to compare two strategies, single vs. double TSP, regarding the duration of the procedure, radiation time, complication rates, and outcomes. Methods: Retrospective analysis of a large cohort of consecutive patients that underwent first PVI with radiofrequency energy (RF), using a point-by-point strategy, with a 3D mapping system, either with single or double TSP, according to the operator's choice. Results: 285 patients with a mean age of 59.5 ± 11.6 years (36.5% female, 67.7% paroxysmal AF) underwent a point-by-point catheter ablation with RF between July 2015 and March 2020. The mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 1.7 ± 1.3. Single TSP was performed in 115 (40.3%) patients and double TSP in 170 (59.6%). The operator's experience (≥5 years of AF ablation procedures) was equally distributed among the two groups. The average procedure time (133 ± 31.7 min vs. 123 ± 35.5 min, for single and double TSP, respectively) did reach a statistical difference between both groups (p = 0.008), but there was a substantial advantage regarding fluoroscopy time (13 ± 6.3 min vs. 19 ± 9.1 min, for single and double TSP, respectively; p < 0.001). Acute major complications present similar rates in both groups (2.6% vs. 2.3%, p = 0.799). At the 2-year follow-up, both groups had a similar sinus rhythm maintenance rate (76.5% vs. 78.8%, p = 0.646). Conclusion: A simplified single-TSP technique using high-density multi-electrode 3D mapping is a safe and highly successful option for AF ablation. This approach yields a substantial reduction in fluoroscopy time, with the potential to avoid acute complications, compared to a conventional double-TSP strategy.
AB - Background: An ablation catheter and a circular mapping catheter requiring a double transeptal puncture (TSP) for left atrial access have been conventionally used for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Recently, different operators have combined a single transseptal puncture technique with 3D high-density mapping catheters for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Objective: This study aims to compare two strategies, single vs. double TSP, regarding the duration of the procedure, radiation time, complication rates, and outcomes. Methods: Retrospective analysis of a large cohort of consecutive patients that underwent first PVI with radiofrequency energy (RF), using a point-by-point strategy, with a 3D mapping system, either with single or double TSP, according to the operator's choice. Results: 285 patients with a mean age of 59.5 ± 11.6 years (36.5% female, 67.7% paroxysmal AF) underwent a point-by-point catheter ablation with RF between July 2015 and March 2020. The mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 1.7 ± 1.3. Single TSP was performed in 115 (40.3%) patients and double TSP in 170 (59.6%). The operator's experience (≥5 years of AF ablation procedures) was equally distributed among the two groups. The average procedure time (133 ± 31.7 min vs. 123 ± 35.5 min, for single and double TSP, respectively) did reach a statistical difference between both groups (p = 0.008), but there was a substantial advantage regarding fluoroscopy time (13 ± 6.3 min vs. 19 ± 9.1 min, for single and double TSP, respectively; p < 0.001). Acute major complications present similar rates in both groups (2.6% vs. 2.3%, p = 0.799). At the 2-year follow-up, both groups had a similar sinus rhythm maintenance rate (76.5% vs. 78.8%, p = 0.646). Conclusion: A simplified single-TSP technique using high-density multi-electrode 3D mapping is a safe and highly successful option for AF ablation. This approach yields a substantial reduction in fluoroscopy time, with the potential to avoid acute complications, compared to a conventional double-TSP strategy.
KW - atrial fibrillation
KW - catheter ablation
KW - complications
KW - safety
KW - transseptal puncture
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85178902268&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1309900
DO - 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1309900
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85178902268
SN - 2297-055X
VL - 10
JO - Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
JF - Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
M1 - 1309900
ER -