A review of multi-criteria decision making approaches for evaluating energy storage systems for grid applications

Manuel Baumann, Marcel Weil, Jens F. Peters, Nelson Chibeles-Martins, Antonio B. Moniz

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Energy storage systems (ESS) are seen as one of the main pillars for a renewable-based energy system. Selecting the most suitable and sustainable ESS for a given project is a problem that involves multiple stakeholders with quite often diverging objectives that cannot all be fulfilled by a single technology. Several studies are available that tackle this problem applying multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). However, these use very different Multi-Attribute Decision Making (MADM) approaches, criteria and goals for decision support, why their results are difficult to compare or to reproduce. This work presents a review of existing MCDA-literature using MADM as a tool for sustainability evaluation of grid-tied ESS. Available studies are summarized, the goals, used MADM methods, and quantification of criteria are analyzed and discussed to provide tentative recommendations. The reviewed studies cover multiple technologies ranging from electrochemical, mechanical or electric ESS. Considered criteria are mainly structured around technology, economy, society, and environment, comprising a high number of individual sub-criteria. The aggregation of these criteria is mainly realized through the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in combination with a wide set of other methods. The quantification of various criteria is often based on different literature sources wherein context-free data for cost, and environmental impacts are used, leading in some cases to inconsistent comparisons in the assessments. Only in a few cases, assessments are linked to specific application requirements, which are decisive factors for the design of an ESS. A minority of the reviewed works include a representative set of decision-makers in their approaches, wherein the number or type of participants is often not communicated transparently. Therefore, most of the studies are considered to have a limited orientation towards practical decision making, but they provide valuable information regarding MADM method development.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)516-534
Number of pages19
JournalRenewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2019

Fingerprint

Energy storage
Decision making
Decision theory
Electric energy storage
Analytic hierarchy process
Environmental impact
Sustainable development
Agglomeration
Costs

Keywords

  • Decision making
  • Energy storage
  • MADM
  • MCDA
  • Renewable energy systems
  • Stakeholder
  • Sustainability

Cite this

@article{37a58c8429414a89a66924f5d4c2e3bb,
title = "A review of multi-criteria decision making approaches for evaluating energy storage systems for grid applications",
abstract = "Energy storage systems (ESS) are seen as one of the main pillars for a renewable-based energy system. Selecting the most suitable and sustainable ESS for a given project is a problem that involves multiple stakeholders with quite often diverging objectives that cannot all be fulfilled by a single technology. Several studies are available that tackle this problem applying multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). However, these use very different Multi-Attribute Decision Making (MADM) approaches, criteria and goals for decision support, why their results are difficult to compare or to reproduce. This work presents a review of existing MCDA-literature using MADM as a tool for sustainability evaluation of grid-tied ESS. Available studies are summarized, the goals, used MADM methods, and quantification of criteria are analyzed and discussed to provide tentative recommendations. The reviewed studies cover multiple technologies ranging from electrochemical, mechanical or electric ESS. Considered criteria are mainly structured around technology, economy, society, and environment, comprising a high number of individual sub-criteria. The aggregation of these criteria is mainly realized through the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in combination with a wide set of other methods. The quantification of various criteria is often based on different literature sources wherein context-free data for cost, and environmental impacts are used, leading in some cases to inconsistent comparisons in the assessments. Only in a few cases, assessments are linked to specific application requirements, which are decisive factors for the design of an ESS. A minority of the reviewed works include a representative set of decision-makers in their approaches, wherein the number or type of participants is often not communicated transparently. Therefore, most of the studies are considered to have a limited orientation towards practical decision making, but they provide valuable information regarding MADM method development.",
keywords = "Decision making, Energy storage, MADM, MCDA, Renewable energy systems, Stakeholder, Sustainability",
author = "Manuel Baumann and Marcel Weil and Peters, {Jens F.} and Nelson Chibeles-Martins and Moniz, {Antonio B.}",
note = "This work was realized within the Helmholtz Association project {"}Energy System 2050{"} and supported by the Helmholtz Institute Ulm HIU as well as the Center for Electrochemical Energy Storage - CELEST Ulm & Karlsruhe.",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.rser.2019.02.016",
language = "English",
pages = "516--534",
journal = "Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews",
issn = "1364-0321",
publisher = "Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam.",

}

A review of multi-criteria decision making approaches for evaluating energy storage systems for grid applications. / Baumann, Manuel; Weil, Marcel; Peters, Jens F.; Chibeles-Martins, Nelson; Moniz, Antonio B.

In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 01.06.2019, p. 516-534.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - A review of multi-criteria decision making approaches for evaluating energy storage systems for grid applications

AU - Baumann, Manuel

AU - Weil, Marcel

AU - Peters, Jens F.

AU - Chibeles-Martins, Nelson

AU - Moniz, Antonio B.

N1 - This work was realized within the Helmholtz Association project "Energy System 2050" and supported by the Helmholtz Institute Ulm HIU as well as the Center for Electrochemical Energy Storage - CELEST Ulm & Karlsruhe.

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - Energy storage systems (ESS) are seen as one of the main pillars for a renewable-based energy system. Selecting the most suitable and sustainable ESS for a given project is a problem that involves multiple stakeholders with quite often diverging objectives that cannot all be fulfilled by a single technology. Several studies are available that tackle this problem applying multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). However, these use very different Multi-Attribute Decision Making (MADM) approaches, criteria and goals for decision support, why their results are difficult to compare or to reproduce. This work presents a review of existing MCDA-literature using MADM as a tool for sustainability evaluation of grid-tied ESS. Available studies are summarized, the goals, used MADM methods, and quantification of criteria are analyzed and discussed to provide tentative recommendations. The reviewed studies cover multiple technologies ranging from electrochemical, mechanical or electric ESS. Considered criteria are mainly structured around technology, economy, society, and environment, comprising a high number of individual sub-criteria. The aggregation of these criteria is mainly realized through the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in combination with a wide set of other methods. The quantification of various criteria is often based on different literature sources wherein context-free data for cost, and environmental impacts are used, leading in some cases to inconsistent comparisons in the assessments. Only in a few cases, assessments are linked to specific application requirements, which are decisive factors for the design of an ESS. A minority of the reviewed works include a representative set of decision-makers in their approaches, wherein the number or type of participants is often not communicated transparently. Therefore, most of the studies are considered to have a limited orientation towards practical decision making, but they provide valuable information regarding MADM method development.

AB - Energy storage systems (ESS) are seen as one of the main pillars for a renewable-based energy system. Selecting the most suitable and sustainable ESS for a given project is a problem that involves multiple stakeholders with quite often diverging objectives that cannot all be fulfilled by a single technology. Several studies are available that tackle this problem applying multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). However, these use very different Multi-Attribute Decision Making (MADM) approaches, criteria and goals for decision support, why their results are difficult to compare or to reproduce. This work presents a review of existing MCDA-literature using MADM as a tool for sustainability evaluation of grid-tied ESS. Available studies are summarized, the goals, used MADM methods, and quantification of criteria are analyzed and discussed to provide tentative recommendations. The reviewed studies cover multiple technologies ranging from electrochemical, mechanical or electric ESS. Considered criteria are mainly structured around technology, economy, society, and environment, comprising a high number of individual sub-criteria. The aggregation of these criteria is mainly realized through the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in combination with a wide set of other methods. The quantification of various criteria is often based on different literature sources wherein context-free data for cost, and environmental impacts are used, leading in some cases to inconsistent comparisons in the assessments. Only in a few cases, assessments are linked to specific application requirements, which are decisive factors for the design of an ESS. A minority of the reviewed works include a representative set of decision-makers in their approaches, wherein the number or type of participants is often not communicated transparently. Therefore, most of the studies are considered to have a limited orientation towards practical decision making, but they provide valuable information regarding MADM method development.

KW - Decision making

KW - Energy storage

KW - MADM

KW - MCDA

KW - Renewable energy systems

KW - Stakeholder

KW - Sustainability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063282109&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.rser.2019.02.016

DO - 10.1016/j.rser.2019.02.016

M3 - Review article

SP - 516

EP - 534

JO - Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews

JF - Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews

SN - 1364-0321

ER -