A Post hoc analysis on rhythm and high intensity interval training in cardiac resynchronization therapy

Xavier Melo, Ana Abreu, Vanessa Santos, Pedro Cunha, Mário Oliveira, Rita Pinto, Miguel Carmo, Bo Fernhall, Helena Santa-Clara

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives. Evaluate the effects of a 6-month High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) program on (1) functional capacity and health-related quality of life, (2) multiple blood biomarkers, (3) echocardiographic parameters, and (4) exercise performance, in patients in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) stratified by the presence of atrial fibrillation (AF), targeting the following questions: (1) Does CRT provide similar benefits in patients in AF and sinus rhythm (SR)?; and (2) Does HIIT provides similar benefits in patients in AF and SR? Design. Estimates were available at baseline and 6 months after CRT implantation in 37 patients with heart failure. Patients were randomized after CRT to a 24-week HIIT group or to a usual care group (CON). In this sub-analysis, HIIT (AF = 7; SR = 11) and CON (AF = 9; SR = 10) were stratified by the presence of AF. Results. Patients in AF benefitted to a lesser degree from CRT in functional status than patients in SR (23.8–46.0%). However, HIIT induced superior improvements in patients in AF compared to CON (23.9–61.0%). Decreases in TNF-α (8.5–42.9%), BNP (15.3–34.6%) and left ventricular mass (9.6–26.2%) were only observed in patients in SR, whereas increases in peak oxygen uptake were only observed in patients in AF (19.5–23.2%). HIIT improved exercise capacity (8.8–59.4%) in patients in SR. Conclusions. Patients in AF or SR undergoing CRT demonstrated distinct benefits from device implantation and from HIIT as an adjunctive therapeutic strategy. This suggests that both mainstay and adjunctive therapeutics may need to be managed differently in patients in AF and SR.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)197-205
Number of pages9
JournalScandinavian Cardiovascular Journal
Volume53
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Jul 2019

Fingerprint

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
Atrial Fibrillation
High-Intensity Interval Training
Exercise

Keywords

  • atrial fibrillation
  • cardiac rehabilitation
  • exercise
  • heart failure
  • reduced ejection fraction
  • Sinus rhythm

Cite this

Melo, Xavier ; Abreu, Ana ; Santos, Vanessa ; Cunha, Pedro ; Oliveira, Mário ; Pinto, Rita ; Carmo, Miguel ; Fernhall, Bo ; Santa-Clara, Helena. / A Post hoc analysis on rhythm and high intensity interval training in cardiac resynchronization therapy. In: Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal. 2019 ; Vol. 53, No. 4. pp. 197-205.
@article{db5b04a7e5f844a69cb6ed0895c45fee,
title = "A Post hoc analysis on rhythm and high intensity interval training in cardiac resynchronization therapy",
abstract = "Objectives. Evaluate the effects of a 6-month High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) program on (1) functional capacity and health-related quality of life, (2) multiple blood biomarkers, (3) echocardiographic parameters, and (4) exercise performance, in patients in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) stratified by the presence of atrial fibrillation (AF), targeting the following questions: (1) Does CRT provide similar benefits in patients in AF and sinus rhythm (SR)?; and (2) Does HIIT provides similar benefits in patients in AF and SR? Design. Estimates were available at baseline and 6 months after CRT implantation in 37 patients with heart failure. Patients were randomized after CRT to a 24-week HIIT group or to a usual care group (CON). In this sub-analysis, HIIT (AF = 7; SR = 11) and CON (AF = 9; SR = 10) were stratified by the presence of AF. Results. Patients in AF benefitted to a lesser degree from CRT in functional status than patients in SR (23.8–46.0{\%}). However, HIIT induced superior improvements in patients in AF compared to CON (23.9–61.0{\%}). Decreases in TNF-α (8.5–42.9{\%}), BNP (15.3–34.6{\%}) and left ventricular mass (9.6–26.2{\%}) were only observed in patients in SR, whereas increases in peak oxygen uptake were only observed in patients in AF (19.5–23.2{\%}). HIIT improved exercise capacity (8.8–59.4{\%}) in patients in SR. Conclusions. Patients in AF or SR undergoing CRT demonstrated distinct benefits from device implantation and from HIIT as an adjunctive therapeutic strategy. This suggests that both mainstay and adjunctive therapeutics may need to be managed differently in patients in AF and SR.",
keywords = "atrial fibrillation, cardiac rehabilitation, exercise, heart failure, reduced ejection fraction, Sinus rhythm",
author = "Xavier Melo and Ana Abreu and Vanessa Santos and Pedro Cunha and M{\'a}rio Oliveira and Rita Pinto and Miguel Carmo and Bo Fernhall and Helena Santa-Clara",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/14017431.2019.1630747",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "197--205",
journal = "Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal",
issn = "1401-7431",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "4",

}

A Post hoc analysis on rhythm and high intensity interval training in cardiac resynchronization therapy. / Melo, Xavier; Abreu, Ana; Santos, Vanessa; Cunha, Pedro; Oliveira, Mário; Pinto, Rita; Carmo, Miguel; Fernhall, Bo; Santa-Clara, Helena.

In: Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal, Vol. 53, No. 4, 04.07.2019, p. 197-205.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Post hoc analysis on rhythm and high intensity interval training in cardiac resynchronization therapy

AU - Melo, Xavier

AU - Abreu, Ana

AU - Santos, Vanessa

AU - Cunha, Pedro

AU - Oliveira, Mário

AU - Pinto, Rita

AU - Carmo, Miguel

AU - Fernhall, Bo

AU - Santa-Clara, Helena

PY - 2019/7/4

Y1 - 2019/7/4

N2 - Objectives. Evaluate the effects of a 6-month High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) program on (1) functional capacity and health-related quality of life, (2) multiple blood biomarkers, (3) echocardiographic parameters, and (4) exercise performance, in patients in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) stratified by the presence of atrial fibrillation (AF), targeting the following questions: (1) Does CRT provide similar benefits in patients in AF and sinus rhythm (SR)?; and (2) Does HIIT provides similar benefits in patients in AF and SR? Design. Estimates were available at baseline and 6 months after CRT implantation in 37 patients with heart failure. Patients were randomized after CRT to a 24-week HIIT group or to a usual care group (CON). In this sub-analysis, HIIT (AF = 7; SR = 11) and CON (AF = 9; SR = 10) were stratified by the presence of AF. Results. Patients in AF benefitted to a lesser degree from CRT in functional status than patients in SR (23.8–46.0%). However, HIIT induced superior improvements in patients in AF compared to CON (23.9–61.0%). Decreases in TNF-α (8.5–42.9%), BNP (15.3–34.6%) and left ventricular mass (9.6–26.2%) were only observed in patients in SR, whereas increases in peak oxygen uptake were only observed in patients in AF (19.5–23.2%). HIIT improved exercise capacity (8.8–59.4%) in patients in SR. Conclusions. Patients in AF or SR undergoing CRT demonstrated distinct benefits from device implantation and from HIIT as an adjunctive therapeutic strategy. This suggests that both mainstay and adjunctive therapeutics may need to be managed differently in patients in AF and SR.

AB - Objectives. Evaluate the effects of a 6-month High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) program on (1) functional capacity and health-related quality of life, (2) multiple blood biomarkers, (3) echocardiographic parameters, and (4) exercise performance, in patients in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) stratified by the presence of atrial fibrillation (AF), targeting the following questions: (1) Does CRT provide similar benefits in patients in AF and sinus rhythm (SR)?; and (2) Does HIIT provides similar benefits in patients in AF and SR? Design. Estimates were available at baseline and 6 months after CRT implantation in 37 patients with heart failure. Patients were randomized after CRT to a 24-week HIIT group or to a usual care group (CON). In this sub-analysis, HIIT (AF = 7; SR = 11) and CON (AF = 9; SR = 10) were stratified by the presence of AF. Results. Patients in AF benefitted to a lesser degree from CRT in functional status than patients in SR (23.8–46.0%). However, HIIT induced superior improvements in patients in AF compared to CON (23.9–61.0%). Decreases in TNF-α (8.5–42.9%), BNP (15.3–34.6%) and left ventricular mass (9.6–26.2%) were only observed in patients in SR, whereas increases in peak oxygen uptake were only observed in patients in AF (19.5–23.2%). HIIT improved exercise capacity (8.8–59.4%) in patients in SR. Conclusions. Patients in AF or SR undergoing CRT demonstrated distinct benefits from device implantation and from HIIT as an adjunctive therapeutic strategy. This suggests that both mainstay and adjunctive therapeutics may need to be managed differently in patients in AF and SR.

KW - atrial fibrillation

KW - cardiac rehabilitation

KW - exercise

KW - heart failure

KW - reduced ejection fraction

KW - Sinus rhythm

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067871343&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14017431.2019.1630747

DO - 10.1080/14017431.2019.1630747

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 197

EP - 205

JO - Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal

JF - Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal

SN - 1401-7431

IS - 4

ER -