A phenotypic search on graft compatibility in grapevine

Sara Tedesco, Ana Pina, Pedro Fevereiro, Friedrich Kragler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

29 Citations (Scopus)


Grafting is the most used propagation method in viticulture and is the unique control strategy against Phylloxera. Nevertheless, its practice remains limited mainly due to inconsistent graft success and difficulties in predicting graft compatibility responses of proposed scion–rootstock combinations, slowing down the selection of elite rootstocks. Aiming to identify optimal phenotypic parameters related to graft (in)compatibility, we used four clones of two grapevine cultivars that show different compatibility behavior when grafted onto the same rootstock. Several physiological parameters, internal anatomy of the graft union, chlorophyll fluorescence, and pigment contents of homo- and heterografts were monitored in a nursery-grafting context. The measurements highlighted enhanced performance of the heterografts due to rooting difficulties of Vitis vinifera homografts. This suggests that in viticulture, homografts should only be used as compatibility controls regarding qualitative attributes. By observing the internal anatomy of the union, we found that grapevines might require longer times for graft healing than anticipated. While Affinity Coefficients were not informative to assess incompatibility, leaf chlorophyll concentration analysis proved to be a more sensitive indicator of stress than the analysis of chlorophyll fluorescence. Overall, we conclude that graft take correlated best with callus formation at the graft junction three weeks after grafting.

Original languageEnglish
Article number706
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2020


  • Graft incompatibility
  • Graft success prediction
  • Grafting
  • Grapevine
  • Richter 110
  • Rootstock
  • Rootstock breeding
  • Syrah
  • Touriga Nacional
  • Vitis


Dive into the research topics of 'A phenotypic search on graft compatibility in grapevine'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this