A global review of ecological fiscal transfers

Jonah Busch; Irene Ring; Monique Akullo; Oyut Amarjargal; Maud Borie; Rodrigo S. Cassola; Annabelle Cruz-Trinidad; Nils Droste; Joko Tri Haryanto; Ulan Kasymov; Nataliia Viktorivna Kotenko; Ariunaa Lhkagvadorj; Felipe Luiz Lima De Paulo; Peter H. May; Anit Mukherjee; Sonny Mumbunan; Rui Santos; Luca Tacconi; Gracie Verde Selva; Madhu Verma; Xiaoxi Wang; Lu Yu; Kecen Zhou

doi:10.1038/s41893-021-00728-0

A global review of ecological fiscal transfers

Jonah Busch, Irene Ring, Monique Akullo, Oyut Amarjargal, Maud Borie, Rodrigo S. Cassola, Annabelle Cruz-Trinidad, Nils Droste, Joko Tri Haryanto, Ulan Kasymov, Nataliia Viktorivna Kotenko, Ariunaa Lhkagvadorj, Felipe Luiz Lima De Paulo, Peter H. May, Anit Mukherjee, Sonny Mumbunan, Rui Santos, Luca Tacconi, Gracie Verde Selva, Madhu VermaXiaoxi Wang, Lu Yu, Kecen Zhou

CENSE - Centro de Investigação em Ambiente e Sustentabilidade

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Ecological fiscal transfers (EFT) transfer public revenue between governments within a country based on ecological indicators. EFT can compensate subnational governments for the costs of conserving ecosystems and in principle can incentivize greater ecological conservation. We review established EFT in Brazil, Portugal, France, China and India, and emerging or proposed EFT in ten more countries. We analyse common themes related to EFT emergence, design and effects. EFT have grown rapidly from US$0.35 billion yr⁻¹ in 2007 to US$23 billion yr⁻¹ in 2020. We discuss the scope of opportunity to expand EFT to other countries by ‘greening’ intergovernmental fiscal transfers.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	756-765
Number of pages	10
Journal	Nature Sustainability
Volume	4
Issue number	9
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00728-0
Publication status	Published - Sept 2021

Access to Document

10.1038/s41893-021-00728-0

Cite this

Busch, J., Ring, I., Akullo, M., Amarjargal, O., Borie, M., Cassola, R. S., Cruz-Trinidad, A., Droste, N., Haryanto, J. T., Kasymov, U., Kotenko, N. V., Lhkagvadorj, A., De Paulo, F. L. L., May, P. H., Mukherjee, A., Mumbunan, S., Santos, R., Tacconi, L., Verde Selva, G., ... Zhou, K. (2021). A global review of ecological fiscal transfers. Nature Sustainability, 4(9), 756-765. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00728-0

@article{fa793b804b484b6c806bc2cbefae732c,

title = "A global review of ecological fiscal transfers",

abstract = "Ecological fiscal transfers (EFT) transfer public revenue between governments within a country based on ecological indicators. EFT can compensate subnational governments for the costs of conserving ecosystems and in principle can incentivize greater ecological conservation. We review established EFT in Brazil, Portugal, France, China and India, and emerging or proposed EFT in ten more countries. We analyse common themes related to EFT emergence, design and effects. EFT have grown rapidly from US$0.35 billion yr−1 in 2007 to US$23 billion yr−1 in 2020. We discuss the scope of opportunity to expand EFT to other countries by {\textquoteleft}greening{\textquoteright} intergovernmental fiscal transfers.",

author = "Jonah Busch and Irene Ring and Monique Akullo and Oyut Amarjargal and Maud Borie and Cassola, {Rodrigo S.} and Annabelle Cruz-Trinidad and Nils Droste and Haryanto, {Joko Tri} and Ulan Kasymov and Kotenko, {Nataliia Viktorivna} and Ariunaa Lhkagvadorj and {De Paulo}, {Felipe Luiz Lima} and May, {Peter H.} and Anit Mukherjee and Sonny Mumbunan and Rui Santos and Luca Tacconi and {Verde Selva}, Gracie and Madhu Verma and Xiaoxi Wang and Lu Yu and Kecen Zhou",

note = "Funding Information: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDB%2F04085%2F2020/PT# Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021, Springer Nature Limited.",

year = "2021",

month = sep,

doi = "10.1038/s41893-021-00728-0",

language = "English",

volume = "4",

pages = "756--765",

journal = "Nature Sustainability",

issn = "2398-9629",

publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",

number = "9",

}

Busch, J, Ring, I, Akullo, M, Amarjargal, O, Borie, M, Cassola, RS, Cruz-Trinidad, A, Droste, N, Haryanto, JT, Kasymov, U, Kotenko, NV, Lhkagvadorj, A, De Paulo, FLL, May, PH, Mukherjee, A, Mumbunan, S, Santos, R, Tacconi, L, Verde Selva, G, Verma, M, Wang, X, Yu, L & Zhou, K 2021, 'A global review of ecological fiscal transfers', Nature Sustainability, vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 756-765. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00728-0

TY - JOUR

T1 - A global review of ecological fiscal transfers

AU - Busch, Jonah

AU - Ring, Irene

AU - Akullo, Monique

AU - Amarjargal, Oyut

AU - Borie, Maud

AU - Cassola, Rodrigo S.

AU - Cruz-Trinidad, Annabelle

AU - Droste, Nils

AU - Haryanto, Joko Tri

AU - Kasymov, Ulan

AU - Kotenko, Nataliia Viktorivna

AU - Lhkagvadorj, Ariunaa

AU - De Paulo, Felipe Luiz Lima

AU - May, Peter H.

AU - Mukherjee, Anit

AU - Mumbunan, Sonny

AU - Santos, Rui

AU - Tacconi, Luca

AU - Verde Selva, Gracie

AU - Verma, Madhu

AU - Wang, Xiaoxi

AU - Yu, Lu

AU - Zhou, Kecen

PY - 2021/9

Y1 - 2021/9

N2 - Ecological fiscal transfers (EFT) transfer public revenue between governments within a country based on ecological indicators. EFT can compensate subnational governments for the costs of conserving ecosystems and in principle can incentivize greater ecological conservation. We review established EFT in Brazil, Portugal, France, China and India, and emerging or proposed EFT in ten more countries. We analyse common themes related to EFT emergence, design and effects. EFT have grown rapidly from US$0.35 billion yr−1 in 2007 to US$23 billion yr−1 in 2020. We discuss the scope of opportunity to expand EFT to other countries by ‘greening’ intergovernmental fiscal transfers.

AB - Ecological fiscal transfers (EFT) transfer public revenue between governments within a country based on ecological indicators. EFT can compensate subnational governments for the costs of conserving ecosystems and in principle can incentivize greater ecological conservation. We review established EFT in Brazil, Portugal, France, China and India, and emerging or proposed EFT in ten more countries. We analyse common themes related to EFT emergence, design and effects. EFT have grown rapidly from US$0.35 billion yr−1 in 2007 to US$23 billion yr−1 in 2020. We discuss the scope of opportunity to expand EFT to other countries by ‘greening’ intergovernmental fiscal transfers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85108434136&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/s41893-021-00728-0

DO - 10.1038/s41893-021-00728-0

M3 - Review article

SN - 2398-9629

VL - 4

SP - 756

EP - 765

JO - Nature Sustainability

JF - Nature Sustainability

IS - 9

ER -

A global review of ecological fiscal transfers

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this