A cross-sectional and prospective analyse of reallocating sedentary time to physical activity on children's cardiorespiratory fitness

Diana A Santos, Adilson Marques, Cláudia S Minderico, Ulf Ekelund, Luís B Sardinha

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is associated with health benefits in children, improving cardiac morphology, cardiovascular disease risk factors, and biological outcomes. This study aimed to examine the substitution effects of displaying a fixed duration of sedentary time with a fixed duration of physical activity (PA) at different intensities on children's CRF. A total of 315 children (136 boys) were assessed (age: 10.6 ± 0.6 years old). Outcomes at baseline and follow-up (16-months) were CRF determined using a maximal cycle test and sedentary time and PA measured with accelerometers. Data were analysed by isotemporal substitution analyses estimating the effect of reallocating 30 min/day of sedentary time by light (LPA), moderate (MPA) and vigorous physical activity (VPA) on CRF. VPA was positively and significantly associated with CRF cross-sectional (β = 0.026, p < 0.001) and prospectively (β = 0.010, p < 0.001). Reallocating 30 min/day of sedentary time into VPA was positively cross-sectionally (β = 0.780, p < 0.001) and prospectively (β = 0.303, p < 0.05) associated with CRF. Conversely, relocating 30-minutes of sedentary time into 30 minutes of LPA and MPA was not associated with CRF. These results suggest that reallocating an equal amount of time from sedentary into VPA is cross-sectional and prospectively associated with a favourable CRF.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1720-1726
Number of pages7
JournalJournal Of Sports Sciences
Volume36
Issue number15
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Keywords

  • Journal Article

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A cross-sectional and prospective analyse of reallocating sedentary time to physical activity on children's cardiorespiratory fitness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this