TY - JOUR
T1 - A Comparative Study of Automated Deep Learning Segmentation Models for Prostate MRI
AU - Rodrigues, Nuno M.
AU - Silva, Sara
AU - Vanneschi, Leonardo
AU - Papanikolaou, Nickolas
N1 - info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDB%2F04152%2F2020/PT#
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/952159/EU#
Rodrigues, N. M., Silva, S., Vanneschi, L., & Papanikolaou, N. (2023). A Comparative Study of Automated Deep Learning Segmentation Models for Prostate MRI. Cancers, 15(5), 1-21. [1467]. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15051467 --- Funding: The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 952159 (ProCAncer-I). This work was partially supported by FCT, Portugal, through funding of the LASIGE Research Unit (UIDB/00408/2020 and UIDP/00408/2020), and under the project UIDB/04152/2020 - Centro de Investigação em Gestão de Informação (MagIC)/NOVA IMS. Nuno Rodrigues was supported by PhD Grant 2021/05322/BD.
PY - 2023/3/1
Y1 - 2023/3/1
N2 - Prostate cancer is one of the most common forms of cancer globally, affecting roughly one in every eight men according to the American Cancer Society. Although the survival rate for prostate cancer is significantly high given the very high incidence rate, there is an urgent need to improve and develop new clinical aid systems to help detect and treat prostate cancer in a timely manner. In this retrospective study, our contributions are twofold: First, we perform a comparative unified study of different commonly used segmentation models for prostate gland and zone (peripheral and transition) segmentation. Second, we present and evaluate an additional research question regarding the effectiveness of using an object detector as a pre-processing step to aid in the segmentation process. We perform a thorough evaluation of the deep learning models on two public datasets, where one is used for cross-validation and the other as an external test set. Overall, the results reveal that the choice of model is relatively inconsequential, as the majority produce non-significantly different scores, apart from nnU-Net which consistently outperforms others, and that the models trained on data cropped by the object detector often generalize better, despite performing worse during cross-validation.
AB - Prostate cancer is one of the most common forms of cancer globally, affecting roughly one in every eight men according to the American Cancer Society. Although the survival rate for prostate cancer is significantly high given the very high incidence rate, there is an urgent need to improve and develop new clinical aid systems to help detect and treat prostate cancer in a timely manner. In this retrospective study, our contributions are twofold: First, we perform a comparative unified study of different commonly used segmentation models for prostate gland and zone (peripheral and transition) segmentation. Second, we present and evaluate an additional research question regarding the effectiveness of using an object detector as a pre-processing step to aid in the segmentation process. We perform a thorough evaluation of the deep learning models on two public datasets, where one is used for cross-validation and the other as an external test set. Overall, the results reveal that the choice of model is relatively inconsequential, as the majority produce non-significantly different scores, apart from nnU-Net which consistently outperforms others, and that the models trained on data cropped by the object detector often generalize better, despite performing worse during cross-validation.
KW - prostate cancer
KW - prostate segmentation
KW - prostate detection
KW - deep learning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85149838461&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000948187100001
U2 - 10.3390/cancers15051467
DO - 10.3390/cancers15051467
M3 - Article
SN - 2072-6694
VL - 15
SP - 1
EP - 21
JO - Cancers
JF - Cancers
IS - 5
M1 - 1467
ER -