TY - JOUR
T1 - A comparative study of analytical rosenthal, finite element, and experimental approaches in laser welding of aa5456 alloy
AU - Hekmatjou, Hamidreza
AU - Zeng, Zhi
AU - Shen, Jiajia
AU - Oliveira, João Pedro
AU - Naffakh-Moosavy, Homam
N1 - Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT-MCTES): Grant number: UIDB/00667/2020 (UNIDEMI).
PY - 2020/4
Y1 - 2020/4
N2 - The thermal regime and microstructural phenomenon are studied by using finite-element (FE) modelling and the analytical Rosenthal equation during laser welding of aluminum alloy 5456 (AA5456) components. A major goal is to determine the merits and demerits of this analytical equation which can be an alternative to FE analysis, and to evaluate the effect of imperative assumptions on predicted consequences. Using results from the analytical and numerical approaches in conjunction with experiments, different physical features are compared. In this study, the results obtained from experiments in terms of melt pool shapes are compared with the predicted ones achieved from the numerical and analytical approaches in which the FE model is more accurate than the Rosenthal equation in the estimation of the melt pool dimensions. Furthermore, as to the partially melted zones, the estimations achieved from the numerical modeling are more genuine than ones from the analytical equation with regards to the experimental results. At high energy density, near keyhole welding mode, the reported results show that experimental melt widths are supposed to be narrower than the fusion widths estimated by the analytical solution. The primary explanation could be the influence of thermal losses that occurred during convection and radiation, which are neglected in the Rosenthal equation. Additionally, the primary dendrite arm spacing (PDAS) estimated with the numerical modeling and the analytical Rosenthal solution is comparable with the experimental results obtained.
AB - The thermal regime and microstructural phenomenon are studied by using finite-element (FE) modelling and the analytical Rosenthal equation during laser welding of aluminum alloy 5456 (AA5456) components. A major goal is to determine the merits and demerits of this analytical equation which can be an alternative to FE analysis, and to evaluate the effect of imperative assumptions on predicted consequences. Using results from the analytical and numerical approaches in conjunction with experiments, different physical features are compared. In this study, the results obtained from experiments in terms of melt pool shapes are compared with the predicted ones achieved from the numerical and analytical approaches in which the FE model is more accurate than the Rosenthal equation in the estimation of the melt pool dimensions. Furthermore, as to the partially melted zones, the estimations achieved from the numerical modeling are more genuine than ones from the analytical equation with regards to the experimental results. At high energy density, near keyhole welding mode, the reported results show that experimental melt widths are supposed to be narrower than the fusion widths estimated by the analytical solution. The primary explanation could be the influence of thermal losses that occurred during convection and radiation, which are neglected in the Rosenthal equation. Additionally, the primary dendrite arm spacing (PDAS) estimated with the numerical modeling and the analytical Rosenthal solution is comparable with the experimental results obtained.
KW - AA5456
KW - Analytical Rosenthal equation
KW - Laser welding
KW - Microstructure
KW - Numerical finite-element modeling
KW - Thermal regime
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084664964&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/met10040436
DO - 10.3390/met10040436
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85084664964
SN - 0379-6779
VL - 10
JO - Metals
JF - Metals
IS - 4
M1 - 436
ER -