Research output

Research output per year 2006 2012 2014 2016 2017 2018 2019 2021 2022

• 2009 Citations
• 18 h-index
• 85 Article
• 36 Chapter
• 6 Conference contribution
• 4 Book
• 9 More
  • 3 Conference article
  • 3 Editorial
  • 1 Paper
  • 1 Special issue
  • 1 Review article

Research output per year

Research output per year

Search results

• 2021

  Inferential Patterns of Emotive Meaning

  Macagno, F. & Rossi, M. G., 2021, Inquiries in Philosophical Pragmatics: Issues in Linguistics. Macagno, F. & Capone, A. (eds.). Springer, p. 83-110 28 p. (Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy and Psychology; vol. 28).

  Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review

  Open Access

  • Inference 100%
  • Defeasibility 58%
  • Slur 57%
  • Recontextualization 53%
  • Descriptive 32%
  1 Citation (Scopus)

• Introduction: Inquiries in philosophical pragmatics – theoretical developments

  Macagno, F. & Capone, A., 2021, Inquiries in Philosophical Pragmatics: Theoretical Developments. Macagno, F. & Capone, A. (eds.). Cham: Springer, p. 1-7 7 p. (Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy and Psychology; vol. 27).

  Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review

  Open Access

  • Semantics 100%
  • pragmatics 78%
  • Indirect Reports 77%
  • Explicature 74%
  • Linguistic Pragmatics 67%

• Introduction. Inquiries in Philosophical Pragmatics: Linguistic and Theoretical Issues

  Macagno, F. & Capone, A., 2021, Inquiries in Philosophical Pragmatics: Issues in Linguistics. Macagno, F. & Capone, A. (eds.). Cham: Springer, p. 1-6 6 p. (Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy and Psychology; vol. 28).

  Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review

  Open Access

  • Linguistic Pragmatics 100%
  • Linguistics 79%
  • Courtroom Interaction 69%
  • pragmatics 58%
  • Scalar Implicature 52%

• The communicative functions of metaphors between explanation and persuasion

  Rossi, M. G. & Macagno, F., 2021, Inquiries in Philosophical Pragmatics: Theoretical Developments. Macagno, F. & Capone, A. (eds.). Cham: Springer, p. 171-191 21 p. (Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy and Psychology; vol. 27).

  Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review

  Open Access

  • Persuasive Communication 100%
  • Metaphor 94%
  • Communicative Function 87%
  • Persuasion 74%
  • persuasion 71%
  2 Citations (Scopus)
• 2019

  Diagnosing misattribution of commitments: A normative and pragmatic model of for assessing straw man

  Walton, D. & Macagno, F., 1 Jan 2019, Further Advances in Pragmatics and Philosophy: Theories and Applications. Capone, A., Carapezza, M. & Piparo, F. L. (eds.). Cham: Springer, Vol. 2. p. 111-136 26 p. (Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy and Psychology; vol. 20).

  Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review

  Open Access

  • Straw Man 100%
  • Fallacies 72%
  • argumentation 71%
  • pragmatics 57%
  • Argumentation 57%
  1 Citation (Scopus)

• Presupposition triggers and presumptive interpretation

  Macagno, F., 2019, Further Advances in Pragmatics and Philosophy: Theories and Applications . Capone, A., Carapezza, M. & Piparo, F. L. (eds.). Cham: Springer, p. 155-179 25 p. (Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy and Psychology; vol. 20).

  Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review

  Open Access

  • Presupposition Trigger 100%
  • Pragmatic Presupposition 72%
  • Semantics 63%
  • pragmatics 49%
  • interpretation 37%
• 2018

  Argumentation schemes

  Macagno, F., Walton, D. & Reed, C., 2018, Handbook of formal argumentation. Baroni, P., Gabbay, D., Giacomin, M. & van der Torre, L. (eds.). Londres: College Publications, p. 519-576 58 p. (Handbooks).

  Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review

  Open Access

• Statutory interpretation as argumentation

  Walton, D., Sartor, G. & Macagno, F., 2 Jul 2018, Handbook of Legal Reasoning and Argumentation. Bongiovanni, G., Postema, G., Rotolo, A., Sartor, G., Valentini, C. & Walton, D. (eds.). Dordrecht: Springer, p. 519-560 42 p.

  Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review

  • statutory interpretation 100%
  • Argumentation 86%
  • argumentation 72%
  • interpretation 43%
  • Argumentation Schemes 42%
  5 Citations (Scopus)

• Types of dialogue and pragmatic ambiguity

  Macagno, F. & Bigi, S., 2018, Argumentation and Language: Linguistic, Cognitive and Discursive Explorations. Oswald, S., Herman, T. & Jacquin, J. (eds.). 1ª ed. Cham: Springer, p. 191-218 27 p.

  Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review

  Open Access

  File
  72 Downloads (Pure)
• 2017

  Evaluating relevance and commitments in rhetorical straw man

  Macagno, F. & Walton, D., 2017, Interpreting Straw Man Argumentation - : The Pragmatics of Quotation and Reporting. Cham: Springer, p. 143-186 44 p. (Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy and Psychology; vol. 14).

  Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review

  • Straw Man 100%
  • Rhetoric 74%
  • Fallacies 48%
  • commitment 46%
  • Target Audience 30%
• 2016

  Reporting and Interpreting Intentions in Defamation Law

  Macagno, F., 2016, Indirect Reports and Pragmatics . Capone, A., Kiefer, F. & Lo Piparo, F. (eds.). Springer, p. 593-619 27 p.

  Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review

  5 Citations (Scopus)
• 2015

  Arguments of interpretation and argumentation schemes

  Macagno, F., 2015, Studies on Argumentation and Legal Philosophy. : Further Steps Towards a Pluralistic Approach. Manzin, M., Puppo, F. & Tomasi, S. (eds.). Napoli: Editoriale scientifica, p. 51-80

  Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review

• The Hidden Acts of Definition in Law - Statutory Definitions and Burden of Persuasion

  Macagno, F. & Damele, G., 2015, Logic in the Theory and Practice of Lawmaking. Araszkiewicz, M. & Pleszka, K. (eds.). Estados Unidos: Springer, p. 225–251

  Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review

  • Persuasion 100%
  • Burden 85%
  • Speech Acts 23%
  • Operational Definition 20%
  • Propositional Content 19%
• 2014

  Analogy and Redefinition

  Macagno, F., 1 Jan 2014, SYSTEMATIC APPROACHES TO ARGUMENT BY ANALOGY. Henrique, R. (ed.). DORDRECHT: Springer, p. 73-89

  Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

• Argumentation schemes and topical relations

  Macagno, F., 1 Jan 2014, Language, reason and education. Giovanni, G. & Andrea, R. (eds.). Bern: Peter Lang, p. 185-216

  Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

• Argumentation Schemes for Statutory Interpretation: A Logical Analysis

  Macagno, F., 1 Jan 2014, Legal knowledge and information systems. Amsterdam: IOS Press, p. 11-20 (Legal knowledge and information systems).

  Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

  17 Citations (Scopus)

• Dialogues and Commitments

  Macagno, F., 1 Jan 2014, Emotive Language in Argumentation. New York: Cambridge University Press, p. 7-7

  Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

• Emotive Language in Argumentation

  Macagno, F., 1 Jan 2014, Emotive Language in Argumentation. New York: Cambridge University Press, p. 9-9

  Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

• Interpretative Argumentation Schemes.

  Macagno, F., 1 Jan 2014, Legal knowledge and information systems. Amsterdam: IOS Press, p. 21-23

  Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

  5 Citations (Scopus)

• Introduction

  Macagno, F., 1 Jan 2014, Emotive Language in Argumentation. New York: Cambridge University Press, p. 1-5

  Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

• Metadialogues and Redefinitions

  Macagno, F., 1 Jan 2014, Emotive Language in Argumentation. New York: Cambridge University Press, p. 8-8

  Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

• Presupposing redefinitions

  Macagno, F., 1 Jan 2014, Rhetoric and cognition. Bern: Peter Lang, p. 249-278

  Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

• The Acts of Defining

  Macagno, F., 1 Jan 2014, Emotive Language in Argumentation. New York: Cambridge University Press, p. 4-4

  Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

• The Emotions in Our Words

  Macagno, F., 1 Jan 2014, Emotive Language in Argumentation. New York: Cambridge University Press, p. 2-2

  Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

• What Our Words Hide Presupposition and Dark-Side Commitments

  Macagno, F., 1 Jan 2014, Emotive Language in Argumentation. New York: Cambridge University Press, p. 6-6

  Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

• When Words Are Emotive

  Macagno, F., 1 Jan 2014, Emotive Language in Argumentation. New York: Cambridge University Press, p. 1-1

  Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

• When Words Are Reasoning Definitions as Strategies of Classification

  Macagno, F., 1 Jan 2014, Emotive Language in Argumentation. New York: Cambridge University Press, p. 3-3

  Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter
• 2013

  Implicatures as Forms of Argument

  Macagno, F., 1 Jan 2013, Perspectives on Pragmatics and Philosophy. Capone, A. (ed.). Berlin/New York: Springer, p. 203-224

  Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

• The acts and strategies of defining

  Macagno, F., 1 Jan 2013, What do We Know about the World? Rhetorical and Argumentative Perspectives. Kišiček, G. & Žagar, I. Ž. (eds.). Windsor (ON): Windsor studies in argumentation, p. 63-78

  Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter
• 2012

  Argumentation Schemes for Statutory Interpretation

  Macagno, F., 1 Jan 2012, Argumentation. Brno: Masaryk University Press, p. 61-75

  Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

• Reconstructing and assessing the conditions of meaningfulness. An argumentative approach to presupposition.

  Macagno, F., 1 Jan 2012, Inside Arguments: Logic and the Study of Argumentation. Ribeiro, H. (ed.). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, p. 247-268

  Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter
• 2011

  Burdens of Persuasion and Proof in Everyday Argumentation

  Macagno, F., 1 Jan 2011, Proceedings of the seventh conference of the international society for the study of argumentation. van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B. J., Godden, D. & Mitchell, G. (eds.). CD-ROM ed. Amsterdam: Rozenberg/Sic Sat, p. 1934–1939

  Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

• Commentary on "The evaluation of emotional arguments: a test run" by Linda Carozza

  Macagno, F., 1 Jan 2011, Argument Cultures: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA). CD-ROM ed. Windsor, Ontario: Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation, p. 1-5

  Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

• Implicatures and Hyerarchies of presumptions

  Macagno, F., 1 Jan 2011, Argument Cultures: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA). CD-ROM ed. Windsor, Ontario: Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation, p. 1-17

  Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

• The dialectical force of missing premises. Enthymemes as dialogical strategies

  Macagno, F. & Damele, G., 1 Jan 2011, ILCLI International Workshop on SEMANTICS, PRAGMATICS AND RHETORIC. Donostia: Argitalpen Zerbitzua - Servicio Editorial, p. 167-170

  Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter
• 2010

  Dialectical and heuristic arguments: presumptions and burden of proof

  Macagno, F., 2010, Dialectics, Dialogue and Argumentation: An Examination of Douglas Walton's Theories of Reasoning and Argument. C. R. & C. W. T. (eds.). Londres: College Publications, p. 45-57 12 p.

  Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review

  Open Access

  File
  13 Downloads (Pure)